Comparative analysis on genomic features of prostate cancer patients with and without treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer: Perspective from liquid biopsy and tissue-based next generation sequencing.
Abstract
e17067 Background: Treatment-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC) serves as a highly aggressive variant of prostate cancer. Genomic features of t-NEPC remained to be further explored. Methods: A total of 398 patients underwent targeted genomic sequencing, with 123 patients harboring t-NEPC and 275 patients without it. Among them, 251 patients received liquid-based sequencing (82 t-NEPC(+) and 169 t-NEPC(-)), and 227 patients received tissue-based sequencing (62 t-NEPC(+) and 164 t-NEPC(-)). Pathogenic somatic/germline variations and rearrangements were included for analysis. Results: For the total cohort, t-NEPC (+) presented more AURKA (t-NEPC(+) vs. t-NEPC(-): 5.7%[7/123] vs. 1.1%[3/275], p=0.012) and CDK12 (13%[16/123] vs. 5.8%[16/275], p=0.026) mutations over the t-NEPC(-). TP53 alterations were comparable (20.3%[25/123] vs. 19.6%[54/275], p=0.892). ERG rearrangement was more frequently observed in the t-NEPC(+) compared to the t-NEPC(-) (14.6%[18/123] vs. 8%[22/275], p=0.048) and was validated by external Immunohistochemistry results (ERG over-expression rate: 25.4%[32/126] vs. 16.6%[48/290], p=0.042). In t-NEPC(+) population, liquid biopsy showed significantly more AR variations (25.9%[21/81] vs. 4.8%[3/63], p=6E-4) but less MYC (2.5%[2/81] vs. 12.7%[8/63], p=0.021), FOXA1 (0%[0/81] vs. 14.3%[9/63], p=4E-4) and FANCA (0%[0/81] vs. 4.8%[4/63], p=6E-4) mutations compared to the tissue-based sequencing. Similar findings were observed in the t-NEPC (-) cohort. Conclusions: t-NEPC was featured by elevated CDK12 alterations and ERG rearrangement rate. For both t-NEPC(+) and t-NEPC(-) populations, combined results from tissue-based sequencing and liquid biopsy were recommended to provide a more comprehensive mutational landscape and facilitate subsequent therapeutic decision-making.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (5)
Qiyu Zhu
Jinge Zhao
Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutics Engineering, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Center for Quantum Technology Research and School of Physics
Yifu Shi
Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Hao Zeng
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University
Junru Chen