Community oncologists' and patients' perspectives on the post-CAR-T care transition: A convergent mixed-methods study.
Abstract
e23134 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy is administered at accredited centers, with (w/) patients (pts) usually transitioning back to their community oncologist (CO) 30 days post-treatment or after acute toxicities resolve. This study explores the challenges faced during this period, from both CO and patient perspectives. Methods: A convergent mixed methods study was conducted between (b/w) March-April 2024. Quantitative aim assessed challenges faced by COs who referred at least 1 pt to Stephenson Cancer Center (SCC) (CAR-T Center) for CAR-T therapy (2019-2024). Online survey w/ hypothetical vignettes were used. COs ranked difficulty of various pt care aspects on a Likert scale from 1 (least) to 5 (most) challenging. Descriptive statistics summarized key challenges. Qualitative aim explored pt challenges. Eligible participants were over 18, referred to SCC, and at least 6 months post-CAR T. Zoom interviews were conducted and assessed for themes. Results: 33/79 (42%) COs completed the survey, w/ 88% from Oklahoma and 12% from neighboring states. 20 pts were interviewed, w/ a mean time of 21 months post-CAR-T therapy. Among responding COs, 79% referred 1-5 pts, 12% referred 6-10, 3% referred > 10 and 6.1% preferred not to answer. Of those referred, 70% reported at least one pt underwent CAR-T therapy. Quantitative and qualitative results were analyzed and integrated using a joint display (Table 1). Regarding post-CAR-T immunization, 82% agreed SCC should set the schedule. 44% viewed SCC as the primary site for administration. The survey inquired about potential steps to cope with challenges during the transition period. COs suggested that a 'Best Practices' handbook (91%) and a CAR-T aftercare webinar (64%) would be helpful. Patients suggested a post-CAR-T therapy timeline and support for immune system optimization. Conclusions: Further research is needed to better understand the pts’ and COs’ experience during the transition period. Implementing resources like a 'Best Practices' handbook, webinar series, and patient education is essential. Convergent mixed-methods analysis - COs' and Pts' perspectives on the Post-CAR-T care. Themes Quantitative Results- Challenges faced by COs (%- Likert Scale) Qualitative Results- Challenges faced by Pts Defining care responsibilities b/w SCC and COs 5: 41 4: 16 3: 22 2: 12 1: 9 Pts were unsure whom to contact (SCC or COs) and were confused by inconsistent guidance Management of RD (relapse disease) 5: 38 4: 28 3: 28 2: 3 1: 3 5 pts were anxious about RD. Others accepted the risk as manageable Communication of events with SCC in post-CAR-T period 5: 13.3 4: 24 3: 13.3 2: 13.3 1: 37 Pts noted occasional communication gaps b/w the SCC and COs but most felt it didn’t impact care Knowledge of administration and timing of re-vaccination 5: 48.3 4: 20.7 3: 13.8 2: 17.2 1: 0 Many pts were unaware/ confused about the need for post-CAR-T vaccinations
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (7)
Aqsa Ashraf
1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, United States
Kira MacDougall
Christus St. Vincent Regional Cancer Center, Santa Fe, NM
Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty
Stephenson Cancer Center at The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
James N. George
The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
Sara Vesely
24University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma city, United States
Sami Ibrahimi
16Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
Dee Terrell-Schnorrenberg
2Hudson College of Public Health, Oklahoma City, United States