Combinations of high risk cytogenetic events in multiple myeloma drive distinct immune remodeling patterns and worse outcomes

W William Pilcher (2Georgia Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, United States) M Marina Michaud (3Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States) S Sarthak Satpathy (1Emory University, Biomedical Informatics, Atlanta, United States) D Denis Ohlstrom K Katherine Ferguson (2Georgia Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, United States) E Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova C Chaitanya Acharya (1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States) D Dimitra Karagkouni Y Yizhe Song M MMRF Immune Atlas Network (1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States) A Alessandro Laganà (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York) S Shaji Kumar M Madhav Dhodapkar (1Emory University of Winship Cancer Institute, Heamtolgy and Oncology, ATLANTA, United States) S Samir Parekh (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York) R Ravi Vij (11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO) H Hearn Cho (1Icahn School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, United States) D David Avigan T Taxiarchis Kourelis (1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States) I Ioannis Vlachos S Sacha Gnjatic L Li Ding G George Mulligan (1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States) S Sagar Lonial (Emory University, Atlanta) A Ajay Nooka (4Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States) M Manoj Bhasin

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a complex hematologic malignancy, where patients often display one or more potentially high risk cytogenetic alterations associated with poor outcomes. Traditional high risk cytogenetics events in myeloma, such as NSD2 t(4;14) translocations, gain of 1q21, or deletion of 17p13, have often been studied in isolation, but emerging evidence suggests the combination of these high risk alterations has a greater negative prognostic impact than any on their own. This has been recently reflected in risk stratification guidelines from IMS and IMWG, which consider certain events, such as t(4;14), as high risk only in combination with gain of 1q21 or deletion of 1p32. Still, the mechanisms through which multi-hit high risk events disrupt the microenvironment and promote poor outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesize that myelomas with multiple high risk alterations remodel the immune environment to promote tumor progression and immune escape. Methods: To study the role of multi-hit high risk cytogenetics on the immune microenvironment, we analyzed CD138-bone marrow aspirate single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data from 337 newly diagnosed MM patients from the MMRF CoMMpass study, generated as part of the Immune Atlas initiative. Cytogenetic alterations for these patients were derived from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing of CD138+ bone marrow aspirates from the MMRF CoMMpass cohort. Patients were classified as multi-hit high-risk MM if they exhibited either (i) two high-risk cytogenetic events, including NSD2 t(4;14), MAF t(14;16), del(17p13), or (ii) one high-risk event with gain of 1q21. Results: Based on cytogenetic information, 33 patients in the Immune Atlas cohort were classified as 'multi-hit’ high-risk, while 34 patients had only a single high-risk alteration. These multi-hit high risk patents displayed significantly worse progression free survival compared to standard risk patients, adjusting for age, therapy, and ASCT (HR=2.34, p<7.2e-5), while single-hit patients showed a non-significant trend towards worse outcomes (HR=1.51, p=0.071). The most frequent multi-hit risk event in the cohort was NSD2 t(4;14) in combination with 1q21, observed in 23 patients. Compositional analysis of the immune populations in the scRNAseq data revealed that relative to both standard and single-hit high risk patients, multi-hit high risk patients displayed significant reductions in IFN-I stimulated CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, marked by decreased expression for antiviral response markers such as ISG15, XAF1, and IFI44L. Enrichment of inflammatory CD16+ non-classical monocytes was also observed. Further analysis of the most frequent multi-hit risk event, NSD2 with 1q21, revealed distinct enrichment of late-activated cytotoxic HLA+ CD8+T cells and cytotoxic CD4+.T cells. Neither alteration was observed in patients with single-hit NSD2 or 1q21. Further analysis on the interactions between high risk events revealed distinct transcriptomic profiles dependent on the high risk events involved, particularly in multi-hit events involving mutations or deletions of TP53 or gain of 1q21. Reduction in IFN-I signaling across various immune populations was primarily restricted to multi-hit risk events involving gain of 1q21. Conversely, patients with biallelic loss of TP53 displayed significant enrichment of these same IFN-I populations. Given this contrast in IFN-I signaling spanning multiple immune subtypes, we hypothesized that the malignant myeloma cells might similarly display altered IFN-I activity. Utilizing CD138+ myeloma bulk RNA sequencing data from CoMMpass, we found that IFN-I response scores strongly correlated between paired scRNA immune and bulk RNAseq tumor datasets (R2: 0.75, p=1.63e-32). Across 660 patients with bulk RNAseq and cytogenetic data, we confirmed significant reductions in IFN-I response scores in tumor cells in multi-hit high risk involving 1q21, and significant enrichment in those with complete loss of TP53 relative to standard-risk MM. Conclusions: Overall, we do observe that MM patients with multiple high risk cytogenetic alterations display distinct immunologic traits relative to standard risk or single-hit high risk patients in addition to significantly worse outcomes. Furthermore, we find variability in the immune alterations observed based on the cytogenetic events involved, further illustrating the heterogeneity in how MM shapes the immune microenvironment.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2179-2179
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (25)

W

William Pilcher

2Georgia Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, United States

M

Marina Michaud

3Emory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States

S

Sarthak Satpathy

1Emory University, Biomedical Informatics, Atlanta, United States

D

Denis Ohlstrom

K

Katherine Ferguson

2Georgia Institute of Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, United States

E

Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova

C

Chaitanya Acharya

1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States

D

Dimitra Karagkouni

Y

Yizhe Song

M

MMRF Immune Atlas Network

1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States

A

Alessandro Laganà

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York

S

Shaji Kumar

M

Madhav Dhodapkar

1Emory University of Winship Cancer Institute, Heamtolgy and Oncology, ATLANTA, United States

S

Samir Parekh

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York

R

Ravi Vij

11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO

H

Hearn Cho

1Icahn School of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, United States

D

David Avigan

T

Taxiarchis Kourelis

1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States

I

Ioannis Vlachos

S

Sacha Gnjatic

L

Li Ding

G

George Mulligan

1Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation, Norwalk, United States

S

Sagar Lonial

Emory University, Atlanta

A

Ajay Nooka

4Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, United States

M

Manoj Bhasin