Cohort-level safety and efficacy results for [ <sup>212</sup> Pb]VMT-α-NET in advanced somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2+)–expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): Cohorts 1–3.

T Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) R Richard L. Wahl (Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO) V Vineeth Sukrithan B Brandon Robert Mancini (BAMF Health, Grand Rapids, MI) S Seyed Ali Mosallaie (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) S Savitha Balaraman (1Corewell Health Beaumont, Hematology and Oncology, Royal Oak, United States) G Gregory Sibley (Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA) J Jason S. Starr (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) L Lowell Brian Anthony (University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Lexington, KY) C Chih-Yi Liao (University of Chicago Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL) S Samuel Mehr (Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE) J Jared Weiss (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC) R Robert A. Ramirez (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) A Amir Iravani Iravani (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) L Lucia Baratto (Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA) W Wenjing Yang A Alaa Hanna (Perspective Therapeutics, Seattle, WA) S Stephen Michael Keefe (Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA) M Markus Puhlmann (Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA) V Vikas Prasad (8Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN)

Abstract

4173 Background: [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET is an alpha-particle radiation-delivering agent targeted to somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2)-expressing tumors. Here, we present safety and efficacy results from the dose-finding phase 1/2a clinical trial (NCT05636618). Methods: This phase 1/2a dose-escalation study uses a Bayesian algorithm to identify an optimal dose of [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET for participants with advanced, well-differentiated NETs expressing SSTR2. Eligible participants must have unresectable or metastatic disease, documented radiologic progression following at least one prior systemic treatment, and evidence of SSTR2 expression (Krenning Score ³2) in ≥1 lesion confirmed on an FDA-approved somatostatin receptor PET scan. Patients previously treated with systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are excluded from enrollment. During the dose-finding phase, participants may receive up to four administrations of [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET at their assigned dose level, and they are monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) for 42 days and safety throughout the study. Efficacy is evaluated by investigators according to RECIST criteria v1.1. Dosimetry is included as a supportive analysis. Results: As of the 10-Dec-2025 data cut-off (DCO), 56 participants had been enrolled across Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 and received at least one dose of [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET: 2 participants in Cohort 1 (2.5 mCi), 46 in Cohort 2 (5 mCi), and 8 in Cohort 3 (6 mCi). No dose-limiting toxicities, grade 5 adverse events, treatment-related discontinuations, serious renal events, dysphagia, or clinically meaningful treatment-related myelosuppression were observed. The median follow-up for all treated participants was 40 weeks (range 6–97). Efficacy has been summarized in this abstract for 25 participants (2 in Cohort 1 and 23 in Cohort 2). Nineteen of these 25 participants remained progression-free at the time of the DCO, with a median efficacy follow-up of 49 weeks (range 6–97). In Cohort 2, investigators observed RECIST v1.1 objective responses in 9 of 23 participants (39%), including 8 confirmed responses. Both participants in Cohort 1 continued to exhibit stable disease after two years of follow-up. Updated safety for all participants and updated efficacy for participants with sufficient maturity beyond the 25 summarized here will be presented at the congress. Conclusions: Treatment with [ 212 Pb]VMT-α-NET continues to demonstrate a favorable safety profile across all treated participants (n = 56) and shows signs of sustained efficacy at the 2.5 mCi and 5 mCi dose levels. The therapy has been well-tolerated with no observed dose-limiting toxicities or serious treatment-related adverse outcomes. Based on these encouraging safety and efficacy findings, the study is ongoing, and enrollment into Cohort 3 (6 mCi) remains active. Clinical trial information: NCT05636618 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4173-4173
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

T

Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

R

Richard L. Wahl

Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, MO

V

Vineeth Sukrithan

B

Brandon Robert Mancini

BAMF Health, Grand Rapids, MI

S

Seyed Ali Mosallaie

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

S

Savitha Balaraman

1Corewell Health Beaumont, Hematology and Oncology, Royal Oak, United States

G

Gregory Sibley

Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA

J

Jason S. Starr

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

L

Lowell Brian Anthony

University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Lexington, KY

C

Chih-Yi Liao

University of Chicago Department of Medicine, Chicago, IL

S

Samuel Mehr

Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE

J

Jared Weiss

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

R

Robert A. Ramirez

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

A

Amir Iravani Iravani

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

L

Lucia Baratto

Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA

W

Wenjing Yang

A

Alaa Hanna

Perspective Therapeutics, Seattle, WA

S

Stephen Michael Keefe

Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA

M

Markus Puhlmann

Perspective Therapeutics, Inc., Seattle, WA

V

Vikas Prasad

8Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN