Cohesin acetylation and ATPase activity control cohesion and loop architecture through distinct mechanisms

L Lorenzo Costantino (Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley) T Tiantian Ye (Department of Statistics, University of California Riverside) K Kevin Boardman (Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley) S Siheng Xiang (Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley) J Jonathan Luo (Biology Department, Queens College of The City University of New York) Y Yudi Mu (Department of Statistics, University of California Riverside) W Wenxiu Ma (State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing and School of Materials Science and Engineering) D Douglas Koshland (Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley)

Abstract

Cohesin is a conserved protein complex that mediates sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, gene regulation, and DNA repair. These processes rely on cohesin’s ability to tether DNA and form chromatin loops, which depend on cohesin’s ATP hydrolysis activity and Eco1-mediated acetylation of two lysines (K112 and K113 in budding yeast) in its Smc3 subunit. However, how cohesin’s ATPase activity and acetylation integrate to control cohesin functions in vivo remains poorly understood. To address this, we analyzed chromatin architecture in yeast mutants with altered cohesin acetylation, and/or ATPase activity. Single K112 or K113 acetyl-null mutants retained wild-type loop length distributions and positioned loops at cohesin-associated regions (CARs), suggesting acetylation of either lysine alone is sufficient for loop positioning. Conversely, Eco1 depletion (removing both acetylations) led to extended loops and loss of positioned loops, despite unchanged cohesin binding. We found that a cohesin acetylation mutant lacking the tethering activity required for cohesion could form positioned loops like the wild type, whereas cohesion-competent mutants lacked positioned loops. Together, these results support a model in which cohesin’s activities required for cohesion and loop formation are mechanistically separable, arguing against a passive loop-capture mechanism. K112 acetyl-mimic mutant partially reduced ATPase activity, yet showed wild-type loop profile, suggesting that lowering ATPase activity does not dictate loop positioning. However, hyper-ATPase mutants exhibited fewer random loops and more positioned loops, indicating that elevated ATPase promotes loop stabilization. Together, these results indicate that acetylation fine-tunes cohesin ATPase activity and function to shape genome architecture.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 123, Issue 17
Published April 28, 2026
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (8)

L

Lorenzo Costantino

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley

T

Tiantian Ye

Department of Statistics, University of California Riverside

K

Kevin Boardman

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley

S

Siheng Xiang

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley

J

Jonathan Luo

Biology Department, Queens College of The City University of New York

Y

Yudi Mu

Department of Statistics, University of California Riverside

W

Wenxiu Ma

State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing and School of Materials Science and Engineering

D

Douglas Koshland

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley