Co-mutation of BCOR and BCORL1 was associated with favorable outcome in the adverse risk patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Mutations in BCOR (BCL6 corepressor) and its homolog BCORL1 (BCL6 corepressor-like 1) are closely associated with the pathogenesis and progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). BCOR mutation (BCORmut) is an adverse marker for AML in 2022 ELN risk stratification. Several studies reported that AML patients with BCORL1 mutation (BCORL1mut) was associated with poor outcomes. However, there are rare data on AML with co-mutation of BCOR and BCORL1 (BCORmut/BCORL1mut). Therefore, we integrated clinical and genomic features to assess its impact on outcomes in patients with AML.Methods Consecutive newly diagnosed AML patients from January 2017 to May 2025 at Peking University People's Hospital were included. were included. Clinical and genetic data were collected and analyzed. Cox regression model was used to identify the variables associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival.ResultsIn newly diagnosed 2209 AML patients, BCORmut/BCORL1mut was detected in 38 (2%) patients; BCORmutor BCORL1mut was detected in 72 (3%) or 31 (1%) patients, respectively. Since the majority of the patients (n = 115, 82%) with BCORmutand/or BCORL1mut were classified in the ELN adverse risk group, we focused on the adverse risk group. Among the 782 patients with adverse risk, 439 (56%) were male. Median age was 52 years (IQR, 38–62 years). With a median follow-up of 16 months (IQR, 8-32 months) for all patients and 22 months (IQR, 12-38 months) for survivors, 393 (50%) patients received intensive chemotherapy; 389 (50%), less intensive chemotherapy. 577 (74%) patients ultimately achieved CR /CRi. 359 (46%) patients underwent transplant. The 3-year probabilities of RFS and survival were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48, 58%) and 52% (49, 59%). The 782 patients were divided into 4 subgroups: BCORmut/BCORL1mut (n = 37, 5%), BCORmut/BCORL1wt (n = 65, 8%), BCORwt/BCORL1mut (n = 13, 2%) and BCORwt/BCORL1wt (n = 667, 85%). Monomeric karyotype (p = 0.003), complex karyotype (p = 0.001), t(v;11q23.3) (p = 0.001), Chr7 abnormalities (p = 0.030), Chr17 abnormalities and/or TP53 mutation (p < 0.001) were the least common and the final CR/CRi rate was the highest (p = 0.015) in the BCORmut/BCORL1mut subgroup compared to others. The 3-year probabilities of RFS (82% vs. 62% vs. 50% vs. 51%, p = 0.021) and survival (93% vs. 71% vs. 58% vs. 50%, p = 0.001) in the BCORmut/BCORL1mut subgroup were the highest compared with BCORmut/BCORL1wt, BCORwt/BCORL1mut and BCORwt/BCORL1wt subgroups. In multivariate analyses BCORmut/BCORL1mut was significantly-associated with favorable RFS (HR = 0.3 [0.1, 0.6], p = 0.003) and survival (HR = 0.2 [0.1, 0.6], p = 0.004). In addition, increasing WBC count at diagnosis, secondary AML, MRD positivity after achieving CR, nontransplant, complex karyotype, t(v; 11q23), t(9; 11), increasing the number of mutations, NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDwt, NPM1wt/FLT3-ITDmut, CBL mutation, ASXL1 mutation, GATA2 mutation, NRAS mutation, TET2 mutation, Chr17 abnormalities and/or TP53 mutation, poor RFS and/or survival.ConclusionsOur study suggested that co-mutation in BCOR and BCORL1 was associated with favorable outcomes in the adverse risk patients with AML. Our conclusion needs to be confirmed by a large cohort prospective study.
Article Details
Authors (19)
Shunjie Yu
School of Microelectronics, University of Science and Technology of China 3 , Hefei, Anhui 230026,
Zongru Li
Lijuan Hu
Ya-Zhen Qin
Guorui Ruan
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
Yazhe Wang
Hao Jiang
Feifei Tang
1Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Jinsong JIA
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing, China
Jing Wang
Hunan Cancer Hospital Changsha China
Qiang Fu
Xiaohui Zhang
Lanping Xu
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Peking University, Beijing, China
Yu Wang
Yuqian Sun
Department of Chemistry, State Key Laboratory of Porous Materials for Separation and Conversion, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Advanced Institute for Future Energy
Yueyun Lai
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, China
Hong-Xia Shi
1Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Centre for Haematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cell and Gene Therapy for Haematologic Malignancies, Peking University, Beijing, China
Xiaojun Huang
Qian Jiang
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences