Closing the distance and the Specialist Nursing Optimal Placement Tool (SN-OPT): Strategic placement of specialist cancer nurses to achieve resource and geographic equity in Australia.
Abstract
11082 Background: Cancer workforce planning that enables effective specialist nurse placement is critical for delivering high-quality, patient-centered care. Inequitable access to specialist nursing represents a significant gap in cancer care delivery. No standardized tools assess specialist cancer nursing resource needs across national healthcare systems. We developed SN-OPT, an innovative resource allocation tool, using 30 new centrally funded specialist melanoma nurse positions for Australia as a case study. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel developed SN-OPT via expert consensus, incorporating three data domains: Clinical Infrastructure Assessment: Analysis of facility capabilities including multidisciplinary team (MDT) structures, clinical trial programs, and existing nursing and support services Demand Assessment: Quantitative analysis of case load, treatment complexity, and nursing workload benchmarks Health Equity: Population-level analysis incorporating geographic accessibility and socioeconomic disadvantage SN-OPT combines cancer incidence data with facility metrics to allocate nursing resources operating within a MDT framework. Equity assessment utilized Australian Statistical Geography Standard, Index of Relative Socio-Economic Disadvantage and Travel Time to Hospitals in Australia dataset. Results: SN-OPT evaluated 46 Australian facilities for melanoma nursing allocation. The weighted scoring algorithm ranked 33 sites for nurse allocation, with a mean allocation of 0.87 full time equivalent (FTE) positions per metro facility and 0.64 FTE per regional facility. The tool achieved equitable geographic distribution of specialist nursing expertise: regional facilities, treating 25% of patients, received 36% of nursing FTE (167 patients/FTE/year). Metro facilities, managing 75% of patients, received 64% of FTE (212 patients/FTE/year). Allocations largely aligned with facility-determined resource need, with 58% receiving their requested FTE. Among the remaining facilities, median allocation variance was -0.4 FTE (range -0.1 -1.0). On a population level, 89% of Australians would have geographic access to specialist melanoma nursing care within 2-hours of travel, including 81% of the most socioeconomically disadvantaged regions. Conclusions: SN-OPT offers a reproducible framework for data-driven allocation of specialist cancer nurses. While implemented using melanoma nurses as a case study, SN-OPT's framework has the potential to be adapted across cancer streams and countries, providing a scalable approach to equitable cancer workforce planning. Early implementation balances clinical service delivery and demand requirements within a MDT framework, while allowing adequate geographical access including socioeconomically disadvantaged regions.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Rebecca Johnson
Georgina V. Long
Alexander M. Menzies
Shahn Coburn
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia
Kristin Linke
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Woodville South, Australia
Grant A. McArthur
Thomas E. Pennington
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia
Megan Lyle
Liz Plummer Cancer Centre, Cairns and Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, QLD, Australia
Lucy Gent
Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Kathryn White
1Wayne State University, Detroit, United States
Maria Gonzalez
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia