CLONEVO: Preoperative abemaciclib for cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) with molecular response assessment.
Abstract
4520 Background: Up to 40% of MIBC patients are ineligible to receive standard neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy creating a significant unmet need. Based on our prior findings of frequent cell cycle alterations, we conducted the first window-of-opportunity, investigator-initiated trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib (abema) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) in MIBC (NCT03837821). Methods: Eligibility was MIBC appropriate for RC and cisplatin-ineligibility or refusal. Planned treatment was abema (200mg BID PO) for 4-8 weeks prior to RC. We planned to enroll 20 patients (accounting for 20% attrition). 16 evaluable patients provided 80% power to detect 0.75 effect size (α = 0.05, r = 0.5 between pairs). Whole-exome (WES) and RNA sequencing of pre- and post-abema tissues and serial evaluation of ctDNA WES were performed on Caris Life Sciences' platform. Results: 20 patients received abema for a median of 36 days. Median age was 73, 16/20 were males, and 5/20 had cT4. 3 didn't undergo RC, and 1 withdrew consent. Abema resulted in pathologic complete response in 18.8% (3/16) and downstaging in 31.3% (5/16). No unexpected safety signals were detected. Grade 3 abema-related adverse events included anemia (4/20), abdominal pain (1/20) and diarrhea (1/20). Imaging Mass Cytometry of pre- and post-abema tissues showed a significant reduction in RB1 phosphorylation after abema confirming on-target activity. Variant allele frequency of somatic mutations significantly decreased after abema by 20.5% (p = 0.04), confirming its role in decreasing tumor burden. Serial ctDNA showed a significant reduction in tumor fraction (TF) following abema by 28.6%. Post-TURBT pre-abema TF increased but rapidly decreased within 2 weeks of abema (19.36%), confirming TF reduction was driven by abema not TURBT. Patients with CCND1 amplification had the most significant decrease in TF (63.8%) highlighting CCND1 as a potential response biomarker. Abema significantly downregulated MKI67, CCNA2, and PCNA proliferation markers with log-fold changes of -1.2, -0.7, and -0.6. Gene set enrichment analysis showed significant downregulation of E2F targets and G1/S transition pathways. Patients who achieved pathologic downstaging had significant decrease in E2F pathway activity (-1.6 vs. -0.4, p = 0.01) confirming that abema suppressed E2F-dependent cell proliferation. Interestingly, abema significantly inhibited homologous recombination repair of double-strand DNA break (DSBs) (FDR = 0.001), particularly TOPBP1 and RAD51. Conclusions: This first trial of short-term preoperative abema in MIBC demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerability while modulating cell cycle-dependent pathways. Our findings support future trials investigating sequential abema with antibody-drug conjugates such as enfortumab vedotin, where abema's effects on DSBs repair augment treatment response. Clinical trial information: NCT03837821 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Bishoy Morris Faltas
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Mohamed Osman
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Mark Gordon Evans
Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ
Daniel Margolis
Weill Cornell Imaging at NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, NY
Cora N. Sternberg
Andrew J. Armstrong, MD, ScM, FACP, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, NC; Arun A. Azad, MBBS, PhD; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Fred Saad, MD, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Maha Hussain, MD, FACP, FASCO, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Taro Iguchi, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan; Arnulf Stenzl, MD, Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; and Cora N. Sternberg, MD, FACP, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Jones T. Nauseef
Convergent Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA
Ana M. Molina
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
David M. Nanus
Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
Neal A. Patel
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Rohit K. Jain
Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
Juan Miguel Mosquera
Philip Abbosh
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Manuel Hidalgo
Nicolas Robine
William F Hooper
New York Genome Center, New York, NY
Olivier Elemento
Namrata Peswani
UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Suzanne Cole
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Douglas Scherr
Weill Medical College, Cornell University, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY
Scott T. Tagawa
Weill Cornell Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY