Clone wars: Evidence of clonal stability in a longitudinal prospective cohort of cancer survivors with serial NGS analysis
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with preleukemic mutations (mutns), collectively termed clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP) serve as the cellular origin of myeloid neoplasms (MN). While risk of MN development varies, its natural history and transformation potential remain poorly defined. Additionally, uncertainty about progression can cause significant anxiety for patients (Tal Sella et al., Blood Advances, 2022). We present findings from our ongoing 10-year CHIP protocol using serial NGS to monitor clonal evolution and MN in cancer survivors. Methods: Within this prospective cohort, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 210 participants who underwent serial NGS from March 2020 to June 2024. Mutns were classified as CHIP+ if they had a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥2% (or ≥1% for IDH1, IDH2, and JAK2). Clonal evolution, categorized as stability, regression, or progression was evaluated by annualized VAF changes, adjusted for age-related increases (e.g. DNMT3A increases by ~2%/yr based on published data). Mutns were classified as slow (≤5%/yr: DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1), intermediate (5–10%/yr: TP53, PPM1D, IDH1/2, KRAS, NRAS, SF3B1), or fast-growing (>10%/yr: JAK2, SRSF2). Growth kinetics for CBL, BCORL1, NF1, and GNAS remain undefined. Biostatistics comparisons used Pearson's Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Of 210 patients, 42 (20%) had at least one CHIP+ mutn. Median age was higher in CHIP+ vs. CHIP– patients (66 vs. 59 years, p<0.001). CHIP positivity was not significantly associated with sex, race, family history, smoking, or alcohol use. No significant differences were observed in prior cancer types (e.g., breast, head and neck) or treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery). Medical histories of cancer, autoimmune disease, and baseline blood counts were also similar. Out of 487 samples, 56 had detectable somatic mutns. The most frequently mutn were DNMT3A (n=27), PPM1D (n=10), and TET2 (n=9). By expected growth kinetics, 37 (66%) mutn were slow-growing, 12 (21.4%) intermediate, 2 (3.5%) fast-growing, and 4 (7.14%) of unknown kinetic category. Only one patient showed clonal progression from their first sample after adjusting for age-related VAF growth, involving DNMT3A. Beyond VAF-kinetics–based progression, 11 patients who had no detectable mutn initially, developed new mutn in subsequent years with DNMT3A (n=7) being the most common acquisition followed by PPM1D (n=2). Some of these later became undetectable, suggesting transient clones. In total, 12 patients (1 by VAF kinetics, 11 by new mutn acquisition) clonally progressed over 5 years of this study (5.7%). Six patients regressed by year 2, with gene mutn VAFs becoming undetectable. These included mutn in PPM1D (n=2), CBL (n=2), TP53 (n=1), and DNMT3A (n=1). Three more patients regressed in year 3 (JAK2, BCORL1, PPM1D), and 1 in year 4 (DNMT3A). In all, 10 patients showed regression over 5 years (17.8%). Notably, 5 of 10 were referred to preventive cardiology and received interventions for cardiac comorbidities. Overall, ~94% of the cohort demonstrated clonal stability or regression. In our cohort, annual VAF growth rates varied from those reported in the literature. Slow-growing mutns such as DNMT3A and TET2 had median rates of 0.83% and 2.11%, aligning with historical rates ≤5%. Intermediate mutns like TP53 and PPM1D had median rates of 1.64% and –0.625%, below the expected 5–10% annual rise. JAK2, a fast-growing mutn, also showed a lower rate of 0.19%. Ongoing follow-up may reveal future changes in VAF kinetics. Conclusion: Despite being a high-risk population due to prior solid malignancy and exposure to chemotherapy or radiation, most patients in this five-year study showed clonal stability. Even among those who acquired new mutns and “progressed”, VAF kinetics remained stable post-detection. CHIP+ clones were transient in some cases, reverting to CHIP- status over time. CHIP's inflammatory link to cardiovascular disease suggests preventive cardiology may impact clonal behavior, though further study is needed. As CHIP detection can elicit significant anxiety for cancer pts, our findings provide reassurance that clonal stability is the predominant pattern in longitudinal CHIP tracking. This cohort will be the control for future comparisons with higher-risk groups; such as those exposed to radioligand or cellular/immunotherapies and VA populations in the next phase of our multi-year CHIP protocol enrollment.
Article Details
Authors (39)
Anmol Goyal
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Akriti Jain
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Salendra Singh
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University
Ying Ni
Sujata Patil
Kirti Arora
9Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, United States
Emmet Samsa
2Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States
Kristen Sykes
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Teodora Kuzmanovic
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Kristie Szymanski
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Donna Horvath
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Natalya Karasik
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Kelsey Pandrangi
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Maedeh Nikoo
3University Hospitals, Cleveland, United States
India Houston
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Sindhusha Veeraballi
4University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
Halle Moore
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Jasmin Hundal
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Jame Abraham
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Thi Ha Zaw
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Jessica Geiger
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Shlomo Koyfman
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
John Molina
1Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland, United States
Sophia Balderman
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Moaath Mustafa Ali
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Anjali Advani
6Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
Sudipto Mukherjee
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Bhumika Patel
Valeria Visconte
1Translational Hematology & Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Aaron Gerds
3Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, United States
Babal Jha
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Rohit Moudgil
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ashish Sarraju
Section of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland
David Bosler
5Cleveland Clinic Diagnostics Institute, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Hetty Carraway
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States
Wen Ma
Jaroslaw Maciejewski
1Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland, United States
Alex Adjei
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
Abhay Singh
1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States