Clinicopathological features and prognostic implications of HER2-low in early-stage male breast cancer: A retrospective analysis.
Abstract
e12518 Background: The clinicopathological and prognostic features of HER2-low female breast cancer (BC) have been widely studied. Current knowledge suggests that HER2-low could be identified as a special entity for treatment. However, limited research has focused on the HER2-low subtype in early-stage male breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study screened male BC cases from all breast cancer patients at a single institution between January 2010 and September 2023. Early-stage cases with non-HER2-positive tumors were included and categorized into HER2-low and HER2-zero groups. Clinicopathological features were collected and compared between the two groups. The primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier method with the Log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate differences in DFS and OS between the groups. Results: A total of 99 early-stage non-HER2-positive male BC cases were identified, with 41 classified as HER2-low and 58 as HER2-zero, and these cases were included in the final analysis. Regarding the clinicopathological features, the HER2-low subgroup exhibited higher androgen receptor (AR) expression (P = 0.003). Regarding survival outcomes, no significant difference was observed in DFS (P = 0.1), but the HER2-low subgroup had a significantly longer OS compared to the HER2-zero subgroup (P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified age and TNM stage as independent prognostic factors for DFS, while age and HER2-low were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: HER2-low population in early-stage male BC had a different clinicopathological feature and prognostic role compared to HER2-zero counterparts. The HER2-low subgroup had a better OS compared to the HER2-zero subgroup, and HER2-low was determined as an independent prognostic factor for OS, but not for DFS.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Qiang Sa
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Hangcheng Xu
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Yan Wang
Yiran Zhou
National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Yun Wu
Interdisciplinary Materials Research Center, School of Materials Science and Engineering
Qing Li
Pin Zhang
Yang Luo
Ying Fan
Ruigang Cai
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Qiao Li
Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Ministry of Education and School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Hongnan Mo
Bo Lan
Jiani Wang
Shanshan Chen
Fei Ma
Peng Yuan
Binghe Xu
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing
Jiayu Wang
Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Novel Functional Polymeric Materials, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Soft Material and New Energy, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University