Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic predictors in cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma: A multicenter cohort study.
Abstract
e17505 Background: The clinicopathological profile and prognostic factors of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma unrelated to diethylstilbestrol exposure are not well characterized in Chinese population. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was conducted to analyze the characteristics of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma patients from 10 medical centers. 97 patients surgically diagnosed with primary cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma were collected from 2010 to 2022. A comprehensive clinicopathological profile of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma patients was depicted. The association between clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors was also assessed. Results: The peak age prevalence occurred in the 46-55 years group (n = 97), with the human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative rate of 85.1%. All surgically treated patients had FIGO stages IA-IIA or IIIC and received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 52 months (interquartile range, 36-70 months), multivariable analysis identified ovarian metastasis (HR = 3.89, P = 0.027 ) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 4.26, P = 0.004 ) as independent risk factors for overall survival. Multivariable analysis also demonstrated that lymph node metastasis (HR = 3.15, P = 0.005 ) remained a significant predictor for progression-free survival. Conclusions: This retrospective multicenter study characterized clinicopathological features of cervical clear cell adenocarcinoma and identified prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with overall survival. Variables Univariate HR (95%CI) P-value Multivariable HR (95%CI) P-value Tumor size >4 cm 3.85 (1.15–12.91) 0.029 3.13 (0.80–12.24) 0.102 DSI >2/3 8.30 (1.81–38.02) 0.006 3.36 (0.62–18.22) 0.161 Ovarian metastasis (Yes) 3.09 (1.03–9.39) 0.047 3.89 (1.17–12.98) 0.027 LVSI (Yes) 4.47 (1.80–11.07) 0.001 0.49 (0.26–3.58) 0.481 LNM (Yes) 4.80 (1.94–11.86) 0.001 4.26 (1.58–11.45) 0.004 Surgical approach (ARH) 1.57 (0.36–6.79) 0.548 - - HR, hazard ratio; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; DSI, depth of stromal invasion; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; LNM, lymph node metastasis; ARH, abdominal radical hysterectomy; LRH, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Ying Zhou
Weiqi Yin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China., Hefei, Anhui, China
Yi Liu
Yuebo Li
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Core Facility Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China., Hefei, Anhui, China
Tao Zhu
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Precise Synthesis of Functional Molecules, Department of Chemistry, School of Science and Research Center for Industries of the Future, Westlake University, 600 Dunyu Road, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang Province, P. R. China
Tang Huarong
Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Fei Xu
Tianmin Xu
Chunyan Lan
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China
Huaiwu Lu
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Guantai Ni
Xiaojun Chen
Caizhi Wang
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China
Jing Liang
Yang Shen
Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics