Clinicopathologic and genomic landscape of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: A single-center experience.

N Noor Farhoud (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) R Raed Moh'd Taiseer Al-Rajabi (Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS) J Joaquina Celebre Baranda (University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, KS) H Haoran Li (Zhejiang University , , 866 Yuhangtang Rd , ,) A Ameer Hamza W Wei Zhang R Ravi Kumar Paluri (Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC) A Ashish Manne (The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) P Prasad Dandawate (University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS) S Subhrajit Saha B Bhargavram Channagiri Srinivas (Department of Medical Oncology, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, India) T Timothy Schmitt (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) S Sean Kumer (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) C Clay King (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) M Mojtaba Olyaee (University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), Kansas City, KS) A Amit Rastogi (University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS) R Reza Hejazi (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) W Weijing Sun A Anup Kasi (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City)

Abstract

e16484 Background: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is an ultra-rare (~1%) pancreatic malignancy. Management is often extrapolated from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) despite distinct molecular drivers. We characterize the clinicopathologic and genomic features of PACC at our center to identify precision oncology targets. Methods: A retrospective review of histologically confirmed PACC at a tertiary academic center was performed. Clinical, radiographic, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data were extracted. Standard of care next-generation sequencing (NGS) results were reviewed, with focus on potentially actionable alterations. Results: Seven patients were identified (median age 64, range 46–70; 57% male). Symptoms included abdominal pain and weight loss; notably, jaundice was absent. Pathologic evaluation demonstrated variable lymph node involvement, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and occasional mixed acinar neuroendocrine differentiation. NGS was performed in a subset of patients and actionable alterations included 9p21.3 co-deletion (CDKN2A/B and MTAP loss), IZKF1 loss, SEC24D-BRAF fusion, and BAP1 mutation (Table 1). All were KRAS wild-type. Surgical resection was performed in three patients, and FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was commonly used. Treatment responses varied. A swimmer plot analysis revealed that 2/7 patients had prolonged progression-free survival ( > 90months and > 200months), while the remaining patients had follow-up < 5 years. At the time of data reporting, four patients were alive without disease recurrence and under ongoing surveillance. Conclusions: Our cohort confirms PACC is molecularly distinct from PDAC, characterized by absence of KRAS mutation and high prevalence of targetable alterations. The identification of MTAP loss and BRAF alteration suggests that PACC patients should be prioritized for specific precision medicine trials (e.g., PRMT5 or MAPK inhibitors) rather than traditional PDAC regimens. Early NGS is mandatory to optimize precision treatment in this rare cancer. Patient Age Sex Presenting Symptoms Tumor Location Resection performed NGS Findings MSI Status TMB Potential Target 1 46 F Abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, fatigue Head Yes Not tested Not tested Not tested N/A 2 68 F Pruritis, abdominal pain, appetite loss, constipation/diarrhea Head Yes TP53 mutation; KRAS wild type; CDKN2A/B loss; MTAP loss; SEC24D-BRAF fusion MSS Intermediate BRAF/MEK/PRMT5 inhibitors 3 67 M Abdominal pain Head Attempted (aborted) Not tested Not tested Not tested N/A 4 70 M Flank pain and hematuria Head No Not tested Not tested Not tested N/A 5 86 F Asymptomatic (incidental lab finding) Head No BAP1 mutation MSS 6.6 EZH2 inhibitors 6 55 M Abdominal pain Tail No CDKN2 A/B loss; IKZF1 loss; MTAP loss; KRAS wild type MSS 6.8 PRMT5 inhibitors 7 57 M Asymptomatic (incidental imaging finding) Head Yes Not tested Not tested Not tested N/A

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

N

Noor Farhoud

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

R

Raed Moh'd Taiseer Al-Rajabi

Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS

J

Joaquina Celebre Baranda

University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, KS

H

Haoran Li

Zhejiang University , , 866 Yuhangtang Rd , ,

A

Ameer Hamza

W

Wei Zhang

R

Ravi Kumar Paluri

Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC

A

Ashish Manne

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

P

Prasad Dandawate

University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS

S

Subhrajit Saha

B

Bhargavram Channagiri Srinivas

Department of Medical Oncology, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, India

T

Timothy Schmitt

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

S

Sean Kumer

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

C

Clay King

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

M

Mojtaba Olyaee

University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC), Kansas City, KS

A

Amit Rastogi

University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS

R

Reza Hejazi

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

W

Weijing Sun

A

Anup Kasi

University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City