Clinicogenomic characteristics associated with non-durable response to first-line immunotherapy among advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma with PD-L1 ≥ 50%.
Abstract
e20614 Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a cornerstone of therapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSqCC) with PD-L1≥50%, clinical outcomes are variable and additional biomarkers to predict response to ICIs are poorly defined. We compared clinical and genomic characteristics of individuals with durable response (DR) and non-durable response (NDR) to ICIs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of individuals with advanced LSqCC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50% treated with frontline ICI-based therapy at Indiana University Health System from January 1, 2018 - June 30, 2025. Demographics, clinical features associated with poor response to ICIs, and next-generation sequencing data were collected using electronic medical records. Response was assessed using standardized real-world criteria. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. DR and NDR were defined as a PFS ≥ and <6 months, respectively. Variables were compared using Wilcoxon/χ²/Fisher’s exact tests. Results: We identified 646 individuals with LSqCC of whom 41 were eligible for analysis. 19 (46%) had a NDR with a mean age of 68 (vs. 66 for DR; p=0.44). 63% were male (vs. 59%; p=0.79), 79% were white (vs. 73%; p> 0.99), and 95% were current/former smokers (vs. 96%; p>0.99). Individuals with NDR had lower baseline hemoglobins but were otherwise similar to those with DR, Table. ICI monotherapy was more common among those with NDR (74% vs. 26%), while chemo-ICI was more frequently used in those with DR (73% vs. 26%, p< 0.01). As expected, response rates (21% vs. 86%; p <0.01), PFS (2.9 vs. 10.8 mo; p< 0.01), and OS (9.4 vs. 19.6 mo; p=0.03) were significantly lower among those with NDR. KRAS alterations were more frequent among those with DR (24% vs. 5%; p =0.19), while CDKN2A and CDKN2B alterations were significantly more common among those with NDR (63% vs. 19% and 21% vs. 0%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: In our cohort, 46% of advanced LSqCC with PD-L1≥50% had a NDR to frontline ICIs. While clinical factors were comparable, chemo-ICI use was more common among DR, suggesting the addition of chemotherapy to ICIs may result in improved outcomes even with PD-L1≥50% LSqCC. The presence of CDKN2A/B alterations among those with NDR suggests a potential association with poor ICI response that warrants further investigation and highlights the role of genomic profiling to identify biomarkers beyond PD-L1 for treatment selection in LSqCC. Variable NDR n=19 (46.3%) DR n=22 (53.7%) P Stage IV 8 (42.1) 11 (50.0) 0.475 Metastasis Brain/Bone/Liver 7 (36.8) 10 (45.5) 0.922 BMI≥25 14 (73.7) 15 (68.2) 0.848 ECOG ≥2 2 (10.5) 3 (13.6) >0.999 Immunosuppression 1 (5.3) 5 (22.7) 0.184 Hb – mean (range) 11.3 (7.3 – 16.7) 12.5 (9.7 – 15.8) 0.047 ANC/ALC ratio ≥3 11 (57.9) 14 (63.6) 0.893 PD-L1 ≥90% 7 (36.8) 11 (50.0) 0.621
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Carina Wong
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
Weston He
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
Paresh Kumar
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
James Slaven
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
ErinMarie Kimbrough
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Mya T. Tran
IU Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Misty Dawn Shields
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
Julian A. Marin-Acevedo