Clinical validation of a multi-modal Ataraxis AI platform for recurrence prediction in early-stage breast cancer across multiple patient cohorts.

J Jan Witowski K Khalil Choucair J Jailan Elayoubi E Elena Diana Chiru N Nancy Chan Y Young-Joon Kang F Frederick Matthew Howard (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) I Irina Ostrovnaya F Freya Ruth Schnabel (NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY) W Waleed Abdulsattar Y Yu Zong (Chemical Biology Program) L Lina Daoud M Marcus Vetter J Jia Wern Pan (Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia) A Arvydas Laurinavicius B Brian Piening C Carlo Bruno Bifulco (Earle A. Chiles Research Institute at Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) A Adam Brufsky (Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh) F Francisco J. Esteva L Lajos Pusztai

Abstract

549 Background: Breast cancer (BC) treatment selection is traditionally guided by clinical characteristics. However, as clinical characteristics cannot capture the complexity of a disease, genomic tools have been developed. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have allowed pathology imaging to be used to build more accurate and comprehensive prognostic/predictive models. In this study, we validated an AI test, powered by a pan-cancer histopathology foundation model, that integrates digital pathology images with clinical variables to predict breast cancer recurrence. Methods: The Ataraxis AI prognostic model (ATX) was developed using 4,659 stage I-III BC patients from 10 distinct cohorts. Ataraxis AI platform first extracts novel morphological features from digitized H&E slides using a pre-trained AI foundation model. These morphological features are then integrated with common clinical characteristics, such as TNM staging, ER/PR/HER2 status, age at diagnosis, or lobular or ductal histology to generate a risk score between 0 and 1. We evaluated ATX on 3,502 patients from 5 external cohorts, including 858 patients with available Oncotype DX (ODX) scores. The primary endpoint of this study was disease-free interval (DFI), defined as the time until first recurrence, with deaths prior to recurrence censored. Results: Across 3,502 patients spanning five validation cohorts, ATX accurately predicted DFI with a C-index of 0.71 [0.68-0.75] and hazard ratio (HR) of 3.63 [3.02-4.37, p < 0.01], computed for every 0.2 unit increase in the test score. Compared to ODX (n = 858), the ATX was more accurate, achieving a C-index of 0.67 [0.61-0.74] versus 0.61 [0.49-0.73]. Additionally, ATX added independent prognostic information to ODX in a multivariate analysis (HR: 3.11 [1.91-5.09, p < 0.01]). ATX demonstrated robust accuracy in TNBC (n = 230, C-index: 0.71 [0.62-0.81], HR: 3.81 [2.35-6.17, p = 0.02]) and HER2+ (n = 353, C-index: 0.67 [0.55-0.80], HR: 2.22 [0.99-5.01, p = 0.05]) groups. Conclusions: (1) ATX is predictive of breast cancer recurrence, (2) ATX improves upon the accuracy of ODX, (3) ATX demonstrates robust performance in all main BC subtypes. ATX evaluated across 5 cohorts individually and pooled, for both Harrell’s C-index and hazard ratio. Cohort N C-index HR Karmanos 168 0.62 [0.49-0.75] 3.82 [1.33-10.98, p=0.01] Basel 269 0.67 [0.58-0.77] 3.98 [1.92-8.25, p<0.01] TCGA 911 0.70 [0.63-0.77] 3.0 [2.1-4.28, p<0.01] Providence 1733 0.74 [0.7-0.79] 4.02 [3.09-5.23, p<0.01] Chicago 421 0.70 [0.60-0.80] 3.25 [1.45-7.31, p<0.01] Pooled 3502 0.71 [0.68-0.75] 3.63 [3.02-4.37, p<0.01]

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 549-549
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Jan Witowski

K

Khalil Choucair

J

Jailan Elayoubi

E

Elena Diana Chiru

N

Nancy Chan

Y

Young-Joon Kang

F

Frederick Matthew Howard

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

I

Irina Ostrovnaya

F

Freya Ruth Schnabel

NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY

W

Waleed Abdulsattar

Y

Yu Zong

Chemical Biology Program

L

Lina Daoud

M

Marcus Vetter

J

Jia Wern Pan

Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia

A

Arvydas Laurinavicius

B

Brian Piening

C

Carlo Bruno Bifulco

Earle A. Chiles Research Institute at Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

A

Adam Brufsky

Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh

F

Francisco J. Esteva

L

Lajos Pusztai