Clinical outcomes of patients with TP53 pathway alterations by treatment type: The MD Anderson Cancer Center IMPACT 2 study.

J Jacopo Venturini (Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mehmet A. Baysal (Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Abhijit Chakraborty (Center for Autoimmunity and Inflammation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology) S Siqing Fu (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D David S. Hong (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) S Sarina A. Piha-Paul (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Aung Naing (Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jordi Rodon Ahnert (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) T Timothy A. Yap E Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jennifer Beck C Clark Andersen (2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) M Michael Kahle D David J. Vining (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) F Funda Meric-Bernstam A Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

3152 Background: TP53 pathway alterations are found in over 50% of human cancers, with variable frequency across tumor types. They are associated with aggressive tumor biology, increased metastatic potential, and poor prognosis. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of patients with TP53 pathway alterations treated in the IMPACT 2 study (2014-2023; NCT02152254). Methods: Patients with advanced cancer underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling (CLIA-certified lab). Pathway analysis was conducted using the maftools R package. TP53 pathway alterations were defined as those involving the TP53 , ATM , CHEK1 , CHEK2 , MDM2 , and MDM4 genes. Patients were treated on clinical trials with investigational agents that included matched targeted therapies (MTTs) when available. MTT included anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy, as previously published (PMID: 27466356). We analyzed the following outcomes by treatment type (MTT vs. non-matched targeted therapy [NTT] and immunotherapy [IO] vs. non-IO): objective response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response), clinical benefit rate (CBR; ORR + stable disease≥4 months), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 491 treated patients with targetable alterations, 278 (56.6%) had p53 pathway alterations (median age, 60.1 years [range, 20.5-81.7]; female, 51.4%; ECOG performance status 1, 86.0%; median number of prior therapies, 3 [range, 0-11]; liver metastases, 42.2%; >2 metastatic sites, 36.0%; high lactate dehydrogenase level, 41.0%; low albumin level, 9%). The most common tumors were colorectal (21.2%), sarcoma (13.7%), other gastrointestinal (12.2%), and breast (8.6%). Immune markers included PD-L1≥1%, 47.3% (78/165); MSI-H, 1% (2/199); and TMB-H, 10.5% (19/181). Concomitant pathway alterations were RTK-RAS (48.6%), PI3K (24.8%), and cell cycle (38.1%) pathways. MTT included VEGF/VEGFR inhibitors, N=57; MDM2 inhibitors, N=4; and TP53 activator, N=1. Clinical outcomes are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Median OS was significantly longer in patients with TP53 pathway alterations treated with IO compared with non-IO regimens. Considering the limited availability of TP53-targeted agents, no differences in clinical outcomes were noted for MTT compared with NTT. Further analyses are warranted to elucidate the molecular substrates underlying immunotherapy benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT02152254 . All patients MTT NTT P IO Non-IO P N=278 N=62 N=216 N=69 N=209 ORR 18/247 4/59 14/188 1.00 9/64 9/183 0.024* % 7.3 6.8 7.4 14.1 4.9 CBR 142/247 37/59 105/188 0.37 43/64 99/183 0.87 % 57.5 62.7 55.9 67.2 54.1 Median PFS, months 3.75 5.52 2.93 0.11 4.37 3.19 0.46 95% CI 2.89, 4.8 4.67, 8.19 2.5, 4.14 2.73, 5.56 2.66, 4.08 Median OS, months 7.99 9.01 7.3 0.96 10.85 6.9 0.024 95% CI 6.18, 9.3 7.17,12.36 5.69, 9.24 7.86, 17.42 5.65, 8.65 *Not significant after multiple testing correction (threshold α = 0.0125).

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 3152-3152
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

J

Jacopo Venturini

Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mehmet A. Baysal

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Abhijit Chakraborty

Center for Autoimmunity and Inflammation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology

S

Siqing Fu

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

David S. Hong

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

S

Sarina A. Piha-Paul

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Aung Naing

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jordi Rodon Ahnert

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

T

Timothy A. Yap

E

Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jennifer Beck

C

Clark Andersen

2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

M

Michael Kahle

D

David J. Vining

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

F

Funda Meric-Bernstam

A

Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX