Clinical outcomes of patients with PI3K pathway alterations by treatment type: The MD Anderson Cancer Center IMPACT 2 study.

A Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jacopo Venturini (Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Mehmet A. Baysal (Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Abhijit Chakraborty (Center for Autoimmunity and Inflammation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology) S Siqing Fu (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D David S. Hong (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston) S Sarina A. Piha-Paul (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Aung Naing (Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jordi Rodon Ahnert (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) T Timothy A. Yap E Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jennifer Beck C Clark Andersen (2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) M Michael Kahle D David J. Vining (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) F Funda Meric-Bernstam

Abstract

3150 Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway regulates cell growth, metabolism, and survival and is involved in immune modulation. Alterations in PI3K signaling drive tumor progression and drug resistance in advanced cancers and are associated with poorer prognosis. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of patients with PI3K pathway alterations treated in the IMPACT 2 study (2014-2023; NCT02152254). Methods: Patients with advanced cancer underwent tumor biopsy and molecular profiling (CLIA-certified lab). Pathway analysis was conducted using the maftools R package. PI3K pathway alterations were defined as those involving the PI3K, AKT1, AKT2, AKT3, MTOR, PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3R1, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2 genes. Cases were discussed at Molecular Tumor Board meetings. Patients were treated on clinical trials with investigational agents that included matched targeted therapies (MTTs) when available. We analyzed the following outcomes by treatment type (MTT vs. non-matched targeted therapy [NTT] and immunotherapy [IO] vs. non-IO): objective response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response), clinical benefit rate (CBR; ORR + stable disease ≥4 months), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 491 treated patients with targetable alterations, 133 (27.1%) had PI3K pathway alterations (median age, 60.3 years [range, 20.5-79.8]; female, 60.9%; ECOG performance status 1, 85.7%; median number of prior therapies, 3 [range, 0-14]; liver metastases, 42.9%; >2 metastatic sites, 44.3%; high lactate dehydrogenase levels, 42.1%; low albumin level, 9%). The most common tumor types were breast cancer (18%), colorectal cancer (15%), and sarcoma (12%). Concomitant pathway alterations were TP53 (49.6% of patients), RTK/RAS (43.6%), and cell cycle (35.3%). Other tumor characteristics included PD-L1≥1%, 40.5% (32/79); MSI-H, 2.2% (2/89); and TMB-H, 10.3% (9/87). MTT included mTOR inhibitors, n=17; AKT inhibitors, n=5, and PI3K inhibitors, n=4. Clinical outcomes are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Taking into consideration the relatively limited use of AKT and PI3K inhibitors compared with mTOR inhibitors, no differences were noted in tumor response, PFS, or OS, by type of treatment. Other contributing factors may include the biological complexity of targeting this pathway, the small number of patients and/or the limited availability and antitumor activity of MTTs. Clinical trial information: NCT02152254 . All patients MTT NTT P IO Non-IO P N = 133 N=26 N=107 N=35 N=98 ORR (%) 9/112 (8.0) 1/23 (4.3) 8/89 (9.0) 0.68 4/32 (12.5) 5/80 (6.3) 0.51 CBR (%) 63/112 (56.3) 15/23 (65.2) 48/89 (53.9) 0.36 18/32 (56.3) 45/80 (56.3) 1.00 Median PFS, months(95% CI) 2.96(2.27, 4.57) 4.08(2.17, NA) 2.66(2.1, 4.37) 0.36 4.14(1.84, 9.86) 2.96(2.24, 4.37) 0.31 Median OS, months(95% CI) 7.79(6.54, 10.92) 9.04 (6.64, 14.99) 7.3 (5.59, 11.21) 0.64 8.75(5.36, 25.55) 7.17(6.18, 0.78) 0.40

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 3150-3150
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

A

Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jacopo Venturini

Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Mehmet A. Baysal

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Abhijit Chakraborty

Center for Autoimmunity and Inflammation, La Jolla Institute for Immunology

S

Siqing Fu

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

David S. Hong

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston

S

Sarina A. Piha-Paul

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Aung Naing

Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jordi Rodon Ahnert

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

T

Timothy A. Yap

E

Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jennifer Beck

C

Clark Andersen

2MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

M

Michael Kahle

D

David J. Vining

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

F

Funda Meric-Bernstam