Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant intravesical mitomycin-C therapy administered immediately prior to TURBT in NMIBC: Over three years of follow-up data from a randomized phase II trial.
Abstract
771 Background: Immediate neoadjuvant intravesical chemotherapy (INAIC) with mitomycin C (MMC), administered before transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, may prevent reimplantation of free-floating cancer cells dislodged during piecemeal resection by reducing their tumorigenic potential preoperatively and increasing MMC concentration in the resected tumor bed. We previously reported per-protocol analysis that showed a 63% recurrence risk reduction with our strategy versus TURBT alone, though not statistically significant (P = 0.11), likely due to limited follow-up (PMID: 36250938). We updated our preliminary analysis to include oncological outcomes over three years for assessing the strategy's long-term sustainability. Methods: This single-center, randomized phase II trial was conducted at the National Cancer Center of South Korea between August 2016 and December 2020 (IRB No. NCC2016-0168). The intervention group received two 40 mg/20 mL doses of MMC one day before and four hours prior to TURBT. The control group underwent standard TURBT only; no patients in either group received immediate post-operative intravesical chemotherapy (IPOIC). The primary endpoint was three-year RFS; secondary endpoints included independent risk factors for recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and cystectomy-free survival (CFS). Statistical analyses used two-tailed tests, with p-values < 0.05 deemed significant. Results: The updated analysis involved 33 intervention and 38 control patients, with similar median follow-up times of 60 and 60.4 months, respectively (P = 0.65). The groups were well matched, with no significant differences in demographics, tumor features, risk classifications, or adjuvant intravesical therapies (all P > 0.05). During a prolonged follow-up period, recurrence occurred in 9.1% (3/33) in the intervention group vs. 31.5% (12/38) of controls. Two INAIC doses with MMC cut recurrence risk by 77% vs. TURBT alone, with 3- and 5-year RFS rates of 90.7% vs. 78.6% and 75.3%, respectively, confirming sustained benefits (P = 0.01). During follow-up, 15.8% (6/38) of control patients progressed and 7.8% (3/33) had cystectomy (ypT0N0, ypT2N0, pT1N0); none in the intervention group did. Two doses of INAIC with MMC significantly improved 3- and 5-year PFS rates compared to controls (100% vs. 92.1% and 85.8%; HR 0.078, P = 0.014) and 3- and 5-year CFS rates (100% vs. 97.4% and 91.1%; HR 0.078, P = 0.014) using Firth’s penalized likelihood method. Conclusions: Our up-to-date analysis further supports using INAIC with two MMC doses for favorable mid- to long-term oncological outcomes in diverse NMIBC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03058757 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Ho Kyung Seo
Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea, Republic of
Hye Won Lee
Geehyun Song
Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-Si, South Korea
Hyung Ho Lee
Eui Hyun Jung
Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-Si, South Korea
Weon Seo Park
Department of Pathology, Center for Urologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-Si, South Korea