Clinical outcomes of muscle-invasive and metastatic, bladder, and urethral pure adenocarcinoma (BUAdenoCa): An international study from the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT).
Abstract
e16565 Background: BUAdenoCa are rare and their management options are limited. The GSRGT assembled an international cohort of pts with BUAdenoCa to evaluate the natural history and clinical outcomes of this rare cancer in the perioperative and metastatic settings. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on pts with locally advanced or metastatic BUAdenoCa receiving systemic therapy between 2000-2026 at 25 medical centers in the US, Europe, South America, and Asia. Median overall survival (mOS), disease-free survival (mDFS), and progression free survival (mPFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for perioperative and metastatic pts. Observed objective response rate (ORR) was determined for metastatic pts receiving systemic therapy by the clinical investigator per RECIST v1.1 criteria when feasible. Results: Among 328 pts with BUAdenoCa, including urachal (47%), urethral (11%), and non- urachal-nonurethral bladder AdenoCa /other (42%). Median age was 61 years; 61% were male; 68% were White, 17% were Black, 12% were Asian; 87% were non-Hispanic. At time of study, most patients were metastatic (65%), followed by muscle-invasive/locally advanced (16%), and non-muscle-invasive/NED (19%). 80% of stage IV pts had visceral metastases, including lung (44%), bone (36%), and liver (17%), while 10% had LN-only disease. Other metastatic sites included peritoneal/mesentery, gynecologic organs, soft tissue, muscle, CNS, and other abdominal or retroperitoneal locations. Among pts with molecular data, 98% were microsatellite stable. Common alterations included TP53 (18%), KRAS (9%), and SMAD4 (5%). Clinical outcomes by type and treatment setting are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: To date, this represents the largest retrospective analysis of BUAdenoCa. These data suggest outcomes differ by type of BUAdenoCa and there is an association between 5-FU based therapy and improved outcomes in both the perioperative and metastatic settings. Analysis Cohort Variable mDFS / mPFS (yrs) mOS (yrs) ORR (% [n/N]) Median DoR (months) Surgery ± perioperative systemic therapy (n=220) Urachal 1.5 6.3 — — Urethral 1.0 4.2 — — Other BUAdenoCa 1.8 3.2 — — 5-FU–based 2.7 NR — — Non–5-FU 2.0 2.7 — — Metastatic 1L systemic therapy (n=138) Urachal 0.68 2.3 — — Urethral 0.37 2.9 — — Other BUAdenoCa 0.54 1.6 — — 5-FU–based 0.64 2.3 29.3% (24/82) 6.8 Non–5-FU 0.57 1.5 22.5% (11/49) 8.7
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Brooke Elizabeth Kania
Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Liliana Ascione
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Roger Li
Department of Genitourinary Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA
Adam Khorasanchi
Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH
Daniel Ang
National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
Dimitrios Stefanoudakis
University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
Sebastiano Buti
Reza Lahiji
Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Kathryn E. Beckermann
Department of Medicine Tennessee Oncology Nashville Tennessee USA
Neil Vaishampayan
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY
Mehmet Murat Zerey
Sophia Sokol
University of Miami, Miami, FL
Pablo Alvarez Ballesteros
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Inkeun Park
Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
Amin Nassar
Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
Nosakhare Paul Ilerhunmwuwa
Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA
Vikas K. Singh
Baptist Health, Louisville, KY
Zeynep Irem Ozay
Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
Andrea B. Apolo
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...