Clinical outcomes of invasive primary urethral cancer: A real world multi-institutional study.

R Rohan Garje (3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States) M Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani (6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States) P Pedro C. Barata (Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA) V Vinay Mathew Thomas (Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) N Neeraj Agarwal (Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA) N Nabil Adra (Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN) R Ravindran Kanesvaran A Alexandra Drakaki M Marsenne Y. Cabral (Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) J Jorge Esteban Villarrubia (Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain) D Daniel Castellano (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid) A Andrea Necchi (Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy) P Philippe E. Spiess A Andrea B Apolo (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) G Guru P. Sonpavde (AdventHealth Cancer Institute Orlando, Orlando, FL)

Abstract

654 Background: Primary urethral cancer (PUC) is a rare and highly aggressive malignancy with a spectrum of various histologies without an established treatment approach. Due to the lack of prospective studies in patients with PUC, the clinical outcomes with different treatment modalities are unknown. We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes based on various treatment approaches and histology. Methods: Our retrospective study included patients from 10 international cancer centers in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Eligibility criteria included patients diagnosed with invasive PUC based on the TNM stage (T2-T4, N0-N2). We defined disease free survival (DFS) as time from date of cancer diagnosis to recurrence or death, whichever came first. We utilized Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to study the DFS rate. Results: We identified 82 patients diagnosed with PUC, of which 60% were men and 40% were women. The common histologies were urothelial carcinoma (40%), squamous carcinoma (32%), adenocarcinoma (12%). Patients had stage II (30%), III disease (26%) and IV disease (44%). In this cohort 51% underwent surgery only (S), 19% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy f/w surgery (NCT), 11% received concurrent chemoradiation f/w by surgery (CRT), 2% received radiation f/w surgery. In our cohort 43% patients had recurrence of disease. In our study cohort, the DFS rate was 54 % after a median follow up of 15.5 months. The 2-year DFS rates were 64.2% for urothelial carcinoma, 45.7% for adenocarcinoma, and 40.0% for squamous cell carcinoma. Based on treatment, 2-year DFS rates were 68% for NCT, 58.3% for CRT, and 46% for S respectively. Median DFS rate was 41 months in patients with lymph node metastasis (LMN) vs 30 months in patients without LMN. Among 14 patients who underwent genomic testing, the most common gene alterations were seen in PIK3CA (35%), PTEN (21%), ERBB-2 (14%) and CDKN2A/B (28%). Conclusions: The management of PUC is complex given the variable histologies. Clinical outcomes appear suboptimal with high rates of recurrence in patients with invasive PUC regardless of histology, treatment, and sex. While our study is limited by its retrospective design, sample size and limited follow up, data suggest that multimodal therapy incorporating chemotherapy with or without radiation may offer better outcomes in invasive PUC. Future large scale prospective studies are needed to optimize treatment approaches in patients with PUC. 2-year DFS based on histology, treatment approach and stage. Survival rate (%) [95%CI] DFS (Histology)  Urothelial 64 [43 - 79]  Adenocarcinoma 45 [14 - 72]  Squamous 40 [17 - 61] DFS (Treatment)  S 46 [29 - 62]  NCT 68 [35 - 86]  CRT 58 [18 - 84] DFS (Gender)  Male 51 [34 - 66]  Female 51 [31 - 67] DFS (AJCC stage)  II 62 [39 - 79]  III 50 [29 - 70]  IV 50 [25 - 67]

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 654-654
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

R

Rohan Garje

3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States

M

Mohammad Arfat Ganiyani

6Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, United States

P

Pedro C. Barata

Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA

V

Vinay Mathew Thomas

Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

N

Neeraj Agarwal

Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA

N

Nabil Adra

Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN

R

Ravindran Kanesvaran

A

Alexandra Drakaki

M

Marsenne Y. Cabral

Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

J

Jorge Esteban Villarrubia

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

D

Daniel Castellano

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid

A

Andrea Necchi

Department of Medical Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori University of Milan Milan Italy

P

Philippe E. Spiess

A

Andrea B Apolo

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

G

Guru P. Sonpavde

AdventHealth Cancer Institute Orlando, Orlando, FL