Clinical outcomes of gabapentinoids for oncologic pruritus: A retrospective cohort study.

A Alim Osman (Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) I Ian Nykaza (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) S Stephen W. Dusza (Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) L Lavanya Mittal (Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Allison Gordon (Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) S Shamir Geller (19Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) C Cesar Antonio Virgen (Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) V Veronica Rotemberg (4Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) D Doris Ponce (3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Adult BMT Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) J Jasmeet Chadha Singh (Department of Medicine, Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) J Jodi Victoria Mones (Department of Medicine, Hematology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) A Alina Markova (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, New York, United States)

Abstract

12066 Background: Pruritus is a debilitating symptom in oncologic patients, sometimes leading to interruption of cancer therapy. Gabapentinoids such as gabapentin and pregabalin are effective for the treatment of uremic and neuropathic pruritus. We report on the safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids for oncologic pruritus defined as any pruritus originating from malignancy, oncologic therapies, or other cancer-associated toxicities, such as cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 4/1/2019 and 8/1/2024, 224 patients who were prescribed gabapentinoids for oncologic pruritus were included. Patients taking gabapentinoids for indications other than pruritus were excluded. The primary efficacy endpoint was ≥ 1-grade improvement for pruritus severity on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 scale. Results: The cohort was predominantly male (54%) and White (67%), with Black (14.3%) and Asian (12.5%) patients also represented; the mean age was 63.2 ± 15 years. Gabapentinoids were most prescribed for drug-induced causes (58.9%) and malignancy-related pruritus (14.3%). Of the drug-induced causes, immune checkpoint inhibitors (40.2%), monoclonal antibodies (12.9%; including mogamulizumab, brentuximab vedotin, and enfortumab vedotin), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.4%) were the most common triggers. Pregabalin was more commonly prescribed compared to gabapentin (80.8% vs. 19.2%). Ninety percent of patients (n=202) experienced a ≥1-CTCAE grade improvement at a median total daily dosage of 50 mg (IQR, 25 mg) for pregabalin and 300 mg (IQR, 50 mg) for gabapentin. Median time for patient-reported improvement was 18.5 days and there was no significant difference in gabapentin response between pruritus etiologies. The most common adverse event was sedation (8.5%), with 3 patients discontinuing gabapentinoids due to fatigue. Conclusions: This study is the first to report that gabapentinoids are a safe and effective way to treat oncologic pruritus stemming from malignancy, cancer therapies, or cutaneous GVHD. Prospective trials would further establish gabapentinoids’ safety and efficacy profile in the oncologic population. Outcomes & adverse events of patients on gabapentinoids. Variable Category/Statistic N (%) CTCAE Grade Change Did Not Improve (0 Grade) 22 (9.8%) Improved 1 Grade 132 (58.9%) Improved ≥ 2 Grade 70 (31.3%) Antineoplastic Therapy Interrupted Due to Oncologic Pruritus Yes 26 (11.7%) No 157 (70.4%) Not Applicable 40 (17.9%) Adverse Events* Sedation 19 (8.5%) Leg Swelling 2 (0.9%) Other 9 (4.0%) *The remaining 194 (86.6%) patients did not report any adverse events related to the gabapentinoids.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 12066-12066
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

A

Alim Osman

Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

I

Ian Nykaza

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

S

Stephen W. Dusza

Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

L

Lavanya Mittal

Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Allison Gordon

Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

S

Shamir Geller

19Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

C

Cesar Antonio Virgen

Department of Medicine, Dermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

V

Veronica Rotemberg

4Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

D

Doris Ponce

3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Adult BMT Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

J

Jasmeet Chadha Singh

Department of Medicine, Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

J

Jodi Victoria Mones

Department of Medicine, Hematology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

A

Alina Markova

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Lymphoma Service, New York, United States