Clinical outcomes of frontline ATG-based immunosuppressive therapy in older patients with aplastic anemia

E Eitan Kugler (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) J Jayastu Senapati (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) S Sanam Loghavi F Farhad Ravandi (Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA) A Alexandre Bazinet (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) A Alex Bataller (2Division of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) C Courtney DiNardo (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) D Danielle Hammond (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) K Kelly Chien (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) W Wei-Ying Jen (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center) G Guillermo Montalban-Bravo K Koji Sasaki (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Gautam Borthakur (5MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) H Hagop Kantarjian (2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) G Guillermo Garcia-Manero T Tapan Kadia (2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

Abstract Background Aplastic anemia (AA) exhibits a bimodal age distribution with incidence peaks in young adults and patients aged >60 years. Despite advances in AA management, including the addition of eltrombopag to ATG-cyclosporine and expanded transplant options, older patients remain underrepresented in pivotal ATG-based trials. Age-related comorbidities, reduced stem cell reserve, concerns about treatment tolerance, and frequent ineligibility for stem cell transplantation (SCT) have led to uncertainty about response and long-term outcomes of ATG-based immunosuppressive therapy in this population. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients ≥60 years receiving ATG-based first-line therapy for AA, comparing those above and below 70 years. NGS-detected benign gene variants were excluded, and no pathogenic germline mutations were identified. Disease severity was defined using bone marrow cellularity <25% and baseline peripheral blood counts as thresholds. RFS was calculated from best response to loss of response or death; OS from treatment initiation to death or last follow-up. Results From 2011 to 2024, 56 patients aged ≥60 years received ATG-based therapy: 26 aged 60-69 years and 30 aged ≥70 years. The median age at diagnosis was 71 (range, 60-85). Fifty-five percent were female. A higher percentage of patients ≥70 had performance status ≥1 (93% vs 72%, p=NS). In both age groups, 73% received eltrombopag together with ATG and cyclosporine. Median hemoglobin, platelets, and WBC at baseline were similar between age groups. The cohort included 29/56 (52%) with non-severe AA, 12/56 (21%) with severe (SAA), and 15/56 (27%) with very severe disease (vSAA). Patients ≥70 years had more SAA and vSAA compared to those <70 (63% vs 40.7%, p=0.025). Two patients <70 years experienced disease transformation. One with refractory AA progressed to AML three months post-diagnosis, while the other achieved CR but developed MDS findings on bone marrow evaluation following count recovery. Two patients underwent SCT for refractory AA. One patient died 9 days post-conditioning due to intracranial hemorrhage, while the second remains in CR at 3 years post-SCT. Gene mutations were detected in 11 patients (18%), most commonly ASXL1 (n=4, 7%), DNMT3A (n=4, 6%), and U2AF1 (n=2, 3.5%), with no significant difference in frequency between age groups. Cytogenetic abnormalities were present in only 2 patients (7%, del(13q) and del(20q)), while conventional karyotype analysis failed in 37% of cases. The overall response rate was 33/56 (59%), with CR achieved in 14/56 (25%) and PR in 19/56 (34%). The OR and CR rates were similar between age groups: 62% (CR 31%) in patients aged 60-69 years versus 57% (CR 20%) in patients ≥70 years (p=0.7 and 0.4 respectively).Eighteen patients (32%) did not respond, and response was not evaluable in 5 patients (9%) due to early death within the first three months (n=4) or loss to follow-up (n=1). The median age of patients with early death was 75.3 years (70.6-81.3). Causes of early death included PRES from CSA, patient-elected palliative care, sepsis, and unknown cause. Among responders, median time to response was 4.2 months (1.7-13.5). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, addition of eltrombopag to ATG and CSA was the only factor that remained significantly associated with response after adjusting for covariates (OR 6.7, p=0.02). At a median follow-up of 35.6 months (95% CI, 20.1-61), the median RFS and OS for the cohort were 32.7 and 55.6 months, respectively. Patients ≥70 years had significantly shorter median RFS and OS (12 and 30.5 months) compared to those <70 years (both not reached, p=0.03). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for covariates including age group, disease severity was the factor most significantly associated with survival, with hazard ratios of 3.8 (1.01-14.2, p=0.04) for SAA and 7.45 (2.4-22.9, p=0.0005) for vSAA. Conclusion Frontline ATG-based IST in older patients with AA is feasible and efficacious with an ORR of 59% and median OS of 55.6 months. The addition of eltrombopag was significantly associated with improved response rates. Early mortality occurred in four patients within the first three months. Disease severity at presentation, rather than age group, was the primary factor associated with survival outcomes.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 3206-3206
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

E

Eitan Kugler

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

J

Jayastu Senapati

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

S

Sanam Loghavi

F

Farhad Ravandi

Department of Leukemia The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

A

Alexandre Bazinet

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

A

Alex Bataller

2Division of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

C

Courtney DiNardo

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

D

Danielle Hammond

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

K

Kelly Chien

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

W

Wei-Ying Jen

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

G

Guillermo Montalban-Bravo

K

Koji Sasaki

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Gautam Borthakur

5MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

H

Hagop Kantarjian

2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

G

Guillermo Garcia-Manero

T

Tapan Kadia

2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX