Clinical outcomes of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in advanced EBV-associated gastric cancer.
Abstract
4049 Background: EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct subgroup of GC with high PD-L1/PD-L2 expression and immune cell infiltration. While several rationales support the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in EBVaGC, clinical evidence from large-scale trials is limited, and their effectiveness remains inconclusive. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcomes of palliative first-line chemotherapy with or without the addition of ICIs in patients with EBVaGC. Methods: We identified 217 patients diagnosed with EBVaGC via in situ hybridization and evaluated their baseline characteristics, including HER2 expression, MSI status, and PD-L1 expression. Among these, 83 patients with metastatic disease received palliative first-line treatment. Of the 77 HER2-negative patients, 23 were treated with ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy (ICI+chemo), while 54 received chemotherapy alone. Survival outcomes and response rates were compared between ICI+chemo and chemotherapy-alone groups. Results: Among 217 EBVaGC patients, 8.5% were HER2-positive, 2.6% were MSI-High, and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and ≥5 was observed in 59.1% and 84.1%, respectively. In HER2-negative EBVaGC patients, ICI+chemo showed significantly prolonged progression free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone (median: 9.28 vs. 6.07 months; HR = 0.48; p = 0.031). There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) (median: 20.72 vs. 18.89 months; HR = 0.78; p = 0.508). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were significantly higher in the ICI+chemo group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (ORR, 78.3% vs. 51.9%; OR = 3.29; p = 0.042; DCR, 100% vs. 79.6%; p = 0.028). In the ICI+chemo group, PD-L1 expression (cutoff: CPS 5 or 10) was not significantly associated with survival outcomes or response rates. For CPS ≥5, the median PFS was 7.84 months compared to 8.99 months in the CPS < 5 group (p = 0.944), the median OS was 20.75 vs. 16.51 months (p = 0.131), and the ORR was 76.5% vs. 75.0%. For CPS ≥10, the median PFS was 13.9 months compared to 8.69 months in CPS < 10 group (p = 0.580), the median OS was 24.95 months vs. 20.33 months (p = 0.061), and the ORR was 81.8% vs. 70.0%. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study represents one of the largest cohorts including patients with EBVaGC who received first-line ICI+chemo. The addition of ICIs to chemotherapy showed clinical benefit, including survival and response rates, compared to chemotherapy alone in EBVaGC. Interestingly, the clinical benefit of ICI+chemo was observed in PD-L1 low group as well as PD-L1 high group. Our results highlight the clinical potential of ICI addition to chemotherapy in EBVaGC, and PD-L1 expression alone is insufficient as a predictive biomarker, warranting further exploration of alternative predictors for immunotherapy efficacy in this subgroup.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Dongwoo Cho
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
Seunghan Kim
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
Se Jun Park
Sook Hee Hong
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
MyungAh Lee
In-Ho Kim