Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy with or without intravesical BCG in NMIBC patients: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

A Arwa M. Ibrahim (University of Sharjah, College of Medicine, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) S Shree Rath (All India Institute of Medical Sc., Bhubaneswar, India) M M. Rafiqul Islam (Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) V Victor Ghosh (School of International Biodesign, New Delhi, India) H Hurriyah Ramzan (Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan) M Mohamed Mansour F Fatima Sajjad (Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan) U Umama Alam (Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan) M Madona Pakkam (University of Medicine and Health Sciences, St. Kitts and Nevis, Saint Kitts and Nevis) D Danisha Kumar (Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan) R Rameez Qasim (Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan) M Muzamil Khan (The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States) N Nouman Aziz (6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States) W Waseem Nabi (5University Florida, Gainsville, United States)

Abstract

e16599 Background: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a recurrent urinary bladder malignancy traditionally treated with intravesical Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG). Newer chemotherapeutics combined with BCG may enhance efficacy and safety, though clinical outcomes remain less-explored. We evaluated BCG monotherapy versus combination therapies through systematic review and network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic literature search of 4 databases identified primary studies on chemotherapeutics with or without BCG in NMIBC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed in R with pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI) using random or common effects models based on the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), with quantification of surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). Results: Our analysis included 19 studies (7,514 patients). For Complete Response (CR), Radiofrequency-Induced Thermo-chemotherapeutic Effect Mitomycin C (RITE-MMC) ranked highest (SUCRA: 91.22) but was less effective than BCG (RR: 0.52, CrI: 0.20–1.30). Chemohyperthermia (CHT), Sequential MMC+BCG and hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) showed comparable efficacy to BCG (RRs: 1.04, 1.05). HIVEC (RR: 0.11, CrI: 0.00–0.66, SUCRA: 87) and titanium glycerosolvate aquacomplex (TGA) (RR: 0.11, CrI: 0.00–0.76, SUCRA: 86.26) demonstrated superior efficacy in Progressive Disease (PD). For Recurrence Rate (RR), Neoadjuvant electromotive MMC (EMDA)+BCG ranked highest (SUCRA: 83.51, RR: 0.22, CrI: 0.02–2.19), followed by Sequential MMC+BCG (SUCRA: 65.82). Sequential MMC+BCG (SUCRA: 100, RR: 0.48, CrI: 0.35–0.67) significantly outperformed BCG (SUCRA: 62.77) in prolonging Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated Sequential MMC+BCG shows promise for improving recurrence-free survival and recurrence rates. HIVEC and intravesical gemcitabine demonstrated superior safety with fewer adverse events, offering valuable insights to optimize NMIBC treatment strategies. Outcome/Intervention (RR, CrI, SUCRA value) Neoadjuvant EMDA+BCG RITE Sequential MMC+BCG HIVEC BEXIDEM IV-Thiotepa BCG (SUCRA) Intravesical gemcitabine PD - - 0.51,0.30-0.85,55.65 0.11,0.00-0.66,87 - 1.03,0.62-1.72,17.22 17.95 0.49,0.13-1.53,53.64 RR 0.22,0.02-2.19,83.51 0.56,0.07-4.62,61.61 0.52,0.12-2.33,65.82 0.49,0.05-4.94,64.49 2.84,0.33-24.59,16.44 0.67,0.08-5.43,56.27 40.52 0.64,0.14-2.95,58.28 RFS - - 0.48,0.35-0.67,100 1.18,0.94-1.53,19.67 - - 62.77 NA Total Adverse Events - - 0.68,0.06-7.97,50.51 0.42,0.06-2.43,66.58 - 0.81,0.07-9.78,45.37 35.44 0.16,0.01-2.17,84.35 Hematuria 0.48,0.06-2.38,63.59 1.01,0.60-1.69,32.56 - 0.28,0.01-2.34,75.27 - 0.31,0.04-1.31,78.03 34.18 0.42,0.01-5.11,62.65 Dysuria - 0.85,0.14-4.93,39.37 - - 0.29,0.04-1.81,76.61 0.43,0.05-3.21,63.15 28.5 -

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

A

Arwa M. Ibrahim

University of Sharjah, College of Medicine, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

S

Shree Rath

All India Institute of Medical Sc., Bhubaneswar, India

M

M. Rafiqul Islam

Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

V

Victor Ghosh

School of International Biodesign, New Delhi, India

H

Hurriyah Ramzan

Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan

M

Mohamed Mansour

F

Fatima Sajjad

Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan

U

Umama Alam

Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan

M

Madona Pakkam

University of Medicine and Health Sciences, St. Kitts and Nevis, Saint Kitts and Nevis

D

Danisha Kumar

Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

R

Rameez Qasim

Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Muzamil Khan

The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States

N

Nouman Aziz

6Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, United States

W

Waseem Nabi

5University Florida, Gainsville, United States