Clinical outcomes of camrelizumab + rivoceranib vs sorafenib (CARES-310) as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) of non-viral and viral etiology.
Abstract
578 Background: CARES-310 (NCT03764293) evaluated the combination of PD-1 inhibitor, camrelizumab (cam), and VEGFR-1-3 inhibitor, rivoceranib (rivo), compared to sorafenib (sor) for the treatment of uHCC. Cam + rivo significantly improved median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to sor (mOS, 23.8 months [mo] [95% CI 20.6, 27.2] vs 15.2 mo [95% CI 13.2, 18.5] hazard ratio [HR] 0.64 [95% CI 0.52, 0.79]; one-sided p<0.0001; mPFS, 5.6 mo [95% CI 5.5, 7.4] vs 3.7 mo [95% CI 3.1, 3.7]; HR 0.54 [95% CI 0.44, 0.67]; one-sided p<0.0001). The most common (≥10%) grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in the cam + rivo arm were hypertension (38.6%) and AST increased (20.2%). Methods: A post-hoc analysis of CARES-310 was performed, where mOS and mPFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the 3 etiology groups of non-viral, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) using the log-rank test. Results: mOS was longer with camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared with sorafenib in patients with non-viral (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.39, 1.19]), HCV (HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.162, 0.84]), and HBV etiologies (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.55, 0.89]) (Table). Similarly, mPFS was longer with camrelizumab plus rivoceranib compared with sorafenib in patients with non-viral (HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.34, 0.91]), HCV (HR 0.50 [95% CI 0.23, 1.06]), and HBV etiologies (HR 0.57 [95% CI 0.45, 0.72]) (Table). Conclusions: Cam + rivo in CARES-310 suggested clinically meaningful mOS benefit in non-viral and viral HCC vs sor and provides assurance of clinical benefit for first line treatment to patients with uHCC independent of etiology. Clinical trial information: NCT03764293 . Etiology Group Camrelizumab + Rivoceranib (n=272) Sorafenib(n=271) Non-viral, n (%) 42 (15.4%) 45 (16.6) mOS, mo (95% CI) 26.8 (10.3, NR) 15.2 (9.6, 23.2) mPFS, mo (95% CI) 6.1 (4.1, 13.8) 3.7 (2.4, 5.5) HCV, n (%) 22 (8.1) 29 (10.7) mOS, mo (95% CI) 31.7 (10.8, NR) 13.3 (8.0, 21.5) mPFS, mo (95% CI) 12.7 (3.7, NR) 3.7 (1.8, 9.1) HBV, n (%) 208 (76.5) 197 (72.7) mOS, mo (95% CI) 23.0 (18.9, 26.0) 15.6 (13.3, 19.2) mPFS, mo (95% CI) 5.6 (5.5, 7.3) 3.7 (2.7, 3.7) HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; mo, months; HR, hazard ratio; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus, NR, not reached. Results used Cox proportional hazard model. Confidence Intervals (CI) used the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Rachna T. Shroff
Wei Shi
Xiuzhi Wu
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, Shanghai, China
Xianzhang Meng
Elevar Therapeutics, Fort Lee, NJ
Melissa Maj
Elevar Therapeutics, Fort Lee, NJ
Kristin Ryan
Elevar Therapeutics, Fort Lee, NJ
Chris Galloway
Elevar Therapeutics, Fort Lee, NJ
Laura Alexander
Elevar Therapeutics, Fort Lee, NJ