Clinical investigators’ (CIs) practice patterns for patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC) harboring PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway abnormalities (PAPm).

K Kevin H. Pang (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) H Hope S. Rugo (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA) T Taylor Wallace (CME Outfitters, Radnor, PA) G Gloria Kelly (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) D Douglas Paley (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) K Kirsten Miller (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) T Trenton Cruse (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) L Leijah Petelka (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) K Kathryn Ziel (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL) N Neil Love (Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL)

Abstract

e13091 Background: Therapeutic targeting of PIK3CA mutations in patients with HR+ mBC has been a clinical reality since the 2019 FDA approval of alpelisib. However, the recent approvals of two novel agents, capivasertib (capi) and inavolisib (inavo), have introduced important new considerations for the care of individuals with these and other PAPm. Relevantly, available data on how clinicians are currently approaching the use of these therapies is minimal. Methods: In October 2024, 21 US-based and international CIs completed a case-based survey on PAPm mBC. A modest honorarium was provided. For each case, key clinical considerations including prior therapy, time to disease progression and biomarker profile were varied. Results: For a 65-year-old patient with disease relapse 2 years into adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy, more than two thirds of the CIs would recommend the combination of inavo/palbociclib/fulvestrant if a PIK3CA mutation was present, regardless of whether there was an ESR1 mutation. For a 65-year-old patient with disease progression after 18 months on first-line treatment with an AI and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), CIs overwhelmingly recommended capi/fulvestrant for a patient with a PIK3CA mutation (20 of 21) or a PTEN or AKT alteration (21 of 21) with no ESR1 mutation. For patients with both PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations, CIs favored capi/fulvestrant over other approaches. Conclusions: The recent availability of capi and inavo has significantly affected current practice patterns, with the majority of CIs rapidly incorporating these therapies into their treatment algorithms for specific patient types. Future work is needed to explore how other factors (eg, age, comorbidities, HER2-low status) and rapidly emerging clinical trial findings (eg, EMBER-3) affect decision-making. Mutation status Multiple metastases2 y into adjuvant A Disease progression18 moon CDK4/6i + AI PIK3CA+ESR1- IPF: 16/21 (76%)CDK4/6i + F: 5/21 (24%) C + F: 20/21 (95%)Alp + F: 1/21 (5%) PIK3CA+ESR1+ IPF: 15/21 (71%)CDK4/6i + F: 5/21 (24%)Other: 1/21 (5%) C + F: 12/21 (57%)E: 6/21 (28%)Other: 3/21 (15%) AKT or PTEN+ESR1- C + F: 21/21 (100%) A = anastrozole; IPF = inavolisib + palbociclib + fulvestrant; F = fulvestrant; AI = aromatase inhibitor; C = capivasertib; Alp = alpelisib; E = elacestrant.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

K

Kevin H. Pang

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

H

Hope S. Rugo

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

T

Taylor Wallace

CME Outfitters, Radnor, PA

G

Gloria Kelly

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

D

Douglas Paley

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

K

Kirsten Miller

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

T

Trenton Cruse

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

L

Leijah Petelka

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

K

Kathryn Ziel

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL

N

Neil Love

Research To Practice, Key Biscayne, FL