Clinical implications of primary and metastatic tumor-informed clonal tracking for MRD assessment in oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

H Hyun Jin Bang (Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea) Y Yongjun Cha H Hyeon-Jong Kim (Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea) B Bom Han H Hyun Jeong Shim (Division of Hemato-Oncology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasungun, South Korea) J Jun-Eul Hwang (Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea) W Woo Kyun Bae S Sung Sun Kim (Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea) K Kyung-Hwa Lee (Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea) I Ik-Joo Chung (Division of Hemato-Oncology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasungun, South Korea) S Sang-Hee Cho (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea)

Abstract

3601 Background: While minimal residual disease (MRD) assays informed by primary tumor sequencing have demonstrated prognostic value in locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), the additive clinical benefit of combined tracking of metastatic-specific private variants in oligometastatic CRC (mCRC) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether a combined primary and metastatic tumor-informed approach improves MRD detection sensitivity and prognostic accuracy following curative resection. Methods: We enrolled 24 patients who underwent curative resection for liver and/or lung oligometastases between 2023 and 2025. A comprehensive tumor-informed panel was designed based on variants identified through whole-exome sequencing (WES) of both primary and metastatic tissues. Serial plasma ctDNA was analyzed at three time points: post-metastasectomy (P1), post-adjuvant chemotherapy (P2), and at the time of recurrence (P3). The clinical performance of a primary tumor-only (PT-only) assay was compared with a combined primary and metastatic tumor-informed (PT+MT) assay. Results: The median age was 65 years (range 33–83), and 18 (75%) were male. Primary tumor locations included the colon (83%) and rectum (17%). Fourteen (58%) patients presented with synchronous metastases. Metastatic sites involved the liver (n = 13), lung (n = 10), or both (n = 1). At P1, P2, and P3, MRD positivity rates using the PT-only assay were 54%, 47%, and 100%, respectively. The PT+MT assay identified only one additional patient as MRD-positive at P1 compared to the PT-only assay. At a median follow-up of 29.2 months (IQR 22.6–32.7), 16 patients (67%) experienced recurrence. The PT-only assay showed significant prognostic impact (HR for ctDNA positivity: 4.53; 95% CI, 1.41–14.57; P = 0.006), which was comparable to the PT+MT assay (HR: 4.46; 95% CI, 1.38–14.38; P = 0.007). While PT+MT tracking did not significantly improve detection sensitivity at P1, it effectively captured clonal dynamics, showing a significant enrichment of metastatic-specific private variants in plasma at recurrence (26%, P3) compared to P1 (17%) and P2 (13%). Conclusions: Integrating metastatic-specific private variants into MRD tracking revealed distinct clonal dynamics but did not significantly enhance clinical sensitivity or prognostic performance compared to a primary tumor-informed assay in patients with oligometastatic CRC. These findings suggest that current MRD assay designs based on primary tumor sequencing remain a robust standard, even in the metastatic setting after curative resection.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 3601-3601
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

H

Hyun Jin Bang

Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea

Y

Yongjun Cha

H

Hyeon-Jong Kim

Division of Hemato-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea

B

Bom Han

H

Hyun Jeong Shim

Division of Hemato-Oncology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasungun, South Korea

J

Jun-Eul Hwang

Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea

W

Woo Kyun Bae

S

Sung Sun Kim

Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea

K

Kyung-Hwa Lee

Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital and Medical School, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea

I

Ik-Joo Chung

Division of Hemato-Oncology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasungun, South Korea

S

Sang-Hee Cho

Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, South Korea