Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular characteriszation of Mecom- rearranged pediatric de novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A retrospective cohort study of the international-berlin-frankfurt-Münster (I-BFM) AML-study group
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: MECOM-rearranged (r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a distinct WHO-defined genetic subtype and includes cases with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) or 3q26.2 fusions with alternative partners. These rearrangements occur in <2% of adult AML cases and are even rarer and poorly characterized in pediatric AML. MECOM-r AML is associated with chemotherapy resistance and poor clinical outcomes. Management of children with this high-risk leukemia subtype remains insufficiently defined. This study thus aimed to characterize the clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular features of pediatric MECOM-r AML and to explore potential prognostic markers and therapeutic approaches. Methods: We conducted a retrospective international cohort study of pediatric and adolescent/young adult patients (0–21 years) newly diagnosed with MECOM-r AML between 1998 and 2022. Eligible cases harbored inv(3)/t(3;3) or alternative 3q26 rearrangements. Data were collected via 18 national and cooperative pediatric AML study groups. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia or myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome were excluded. Karyotypes were centrally reviewed. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess clinical features and predictors of response and survival. Due to missing data, some analyses were limited to evaluable cases (EC). Results: Of 69 submitted cases, 10 were deemed ineligible as MECOM rearrangement was unconfirmed. Amongst the 59 patient study cohort, median age was 14.3 years (range 0.9–20.8) with equal sex distribution. Median diagnostic bone marrow blast percentage was 65% (range 6–95), although 12% (6/47 ECs) had <20% blasts and may have been classified as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in prior years. Dysmegakaryopoiesis was observed in 61% (16/26 EC). Inv(3)was identified in54% (32/59 ECs), while others harbored rare fusions, most commonly from t(3;12)(q26;q22). Monosomy 7 was detected in 80% (45/56 EC) and FLT3-ITD in 26% (12/46 EC) with similar frequencies across subtypes. Six of 39 patients (15%) presented with diabetes insipidus at diagnosis, four with abnormal hypophyseal imaging. Nearly all patients (55/56 EC) received multi-agent AML chemotherapy. After two induction cycles, 68% of patients with response data (n=38) showed resistant disease. Overall, complete remission (CR) rates were low but similar between inv(3) and non-inv(3) cases (47% vs. 50%). In a multivariate logistic regression, monosomy 7 was significantly associated with resistant disease (OR 6.21, 95% CI 1.08–44.75, p=0.048), while inv(3) showed a non-significant trend toward poorer response (OR 2.60, 95% CI 0.54–14.95, p=0.25). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first CR or without morphologic CR was performed in 67% (35/52) patients; 37% (13/35) survived (7 transplanted in CR, 3 in non-CR, 3 unknown), while 63% (22/35) died post-HSCT (13 due to relapse; toxicity 5; unknown cause 4). Of the 17 patients without primary HSCT, two survived, but both required HSCT subsequent to relapse. Only 29% (15/52 EC) of patients achieved long-term remission with 38% 5-year overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant survival difference between inv(3)and other MECOM-r subtypes (p=0.20). Cox regression analysis of the subset of 26 patients with evaluable data showed a non-significant increase in hazard of death for inv(3)(HR 2.04, 95% CI 0.72–5.77, p=0.18). Conclusion: This is the largest international cohort of pediatric MECOM-r AML to date and underscores the poor prognosis of this high-risk leukemia subtype also in children. Co-occurring monosomy 7 was a significant independent predictor of chemotherapy resistance. Our data prove that also pediatric MECOM-r AML shares features with MDS, including prominent dysplasia and monosomy 7. As updated in the WHO 2022 classification, blast count is no longer a defining criterion when specific genetic alterations are present. However, since MDS diagnosis was not an inclusion criterion, patients with <20% blasts were likely underrepresented, limiting insight into the full clinical spectrum of MECOM-driven myeloid malignancies. While HSCT remains the only chance for durable remission, OS of patients with MECOM-r AML remains poor. Ongoing molecular and functional analyses are needed to identify cooperating mutations and cellular vulnerabilities potentially amenable to new and more effective therapeutic approaches.
Article Details
Authors (38)
Anna Cvrtak
1St. Anna Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Karin Nebral
Heidrun Boztug
6Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Oussama Abla
2Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
Evangelia Antoniou
Barbara Buldini
Malgorzata Czogala
8Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Institute of Pediatrics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Valerie de Haas
9Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
Amber Gibson
1Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mane Gizhlaryan
11Pediatric Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Armenia, Hematology Center after Prof. R.H. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia
Bianca Goemans
1Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
Irén Haltrich
12Pediatric Center, Semmelweis University, Faculty of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
Hiroto Inaba
Nkemdirim Jacob
14Department of Hematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Kristian Juul-Dam
15Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Charikleia Kelaidi
16Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
Jeffery Klco
Nora Mühlegger
2St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
Tasleema Patel
18Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Martina Pigazzi
Nastassja Scheidegger
Marketa Zaliova
20Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
Jonas Abrahamsson
Todd Cooper
5University of Washington, Seattle Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle, United States
Branko Cuglievan
Barbara De Moerloose
Brenda Gibson
14Department of Hematology and Oncology, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
Henrik Hasle
13Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Gertjan Kaspers
9Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
Franco Locatelli
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù Rome, Rome
Arnaud Petit
20Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Armand-Trousseau Hospital Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris and Sorbonne University, Paris, France
Sophia Polychronopoulou
16Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Aghia Sophia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
Dirk Reinhardt
23Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie, Essen, Germany
Patricia Rubio
26Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Genetics Department, Hospital de Pediatría “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Jan Stary
20Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
Sarah Tasian
2Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Philadelphia, United States
Daisuke Tomizawa
Michael Dworzak
1St. Anna Children's Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria