Clinical characteristics, molecular landscape and survival outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer from western India.

K Kunal Naishadh Jobanputra (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) K Kshitij Joshi (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) U Udip Maheshwari (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) A Ashish Joshi (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) V Vashishth Maniar (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) P Pritam Kalaskar (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Thane, India) S Smit Sheth (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) P Pradip Kendre (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) K Krushna Chaudhari (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Indore, India) T Taha Sethjiwala (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Indore, India) A Akshay Shivchhand (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Kolhapur, India) P Prakash Devde (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Chh. Sambhajinagar, India) C Chandrashekhar Pethe (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nashik, India) S Sonal Dhande (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nashik, India) D Disha Morzaria (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) S Shrenika Bhosale (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India) M Mangesh ASHOK Mekha (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Pune, India) M Makarand Randive (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nagpur, India) R Ritu Dave (MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Pune, India)

Abstract

e16401 Background: Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy often diagnosed at an advanced, metastatic stage, leading to poor prognosis. Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer between March 2018 and September 2024. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 353 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 65 years (IQR 56–71) and F:M ratio of 1:1.3. Distribution of patients according to ECOG-PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Perfomance Status) was : 0-1 in 270 patients (76.5%) and > = 2 in 83 patients (23.5%). A total of 302 patients (85.6%) had de novo metastatic disease, while 51 patients (14.4%) had metachronous metastases. Predominant sites of metastases were: liver (n = 250, 70.8%), distant lymph nodes (n = 142, 40.2%), lung/pleura (n = 70,19.8%), and peritoneum (n = 30 (8.5%). Pancreatic head was the most common site (44.4%), followed by body and tail (27.8% each). The median follow-up was 17.3 months (95% CI: 14.3–20.3) and 235 patients received systemic therapy, 65 were offered best supportive care alone while 53 patients were lost to follow-up. Most common first-line treatment regimens were Gemcitabine-nabpaclitaxel (GN) (n = 93) and FOLFIRINOX (n = 50). Median overall survival (mOS) for the whole cohort was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.2–10.9) with 2-year OS of 20%. Patients who received GN had mOS of 12.2 months (95% CI: 8.1–16.3), while mOS among those who received FOLFIRINOX was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.7–15.1) and it was 11.4 months (95% CI: 8.0–14.9) for those who received other regimens (p = 0.796). First-line PFS of the cohort was 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.8–9.9). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that ECOG-PS > = 2, liver and lung metastases were poor prognostic factors for OS, while age < = 50, tumor location, first-line chemotherapy regimen were not found to be significant factors. Mutational analysis using NGS was performed in 111 patients, with most common alterations being KRAS (40.5%) and TP53 (36.9%). Additional alterations of interest included HER2 amplification (3.6%), BRCA1/2 (2.7%), BRAF (0.9%) and RET (0.9%). The mOS was 18.7 months for KRAS -mutant/ TP53 -wild-type, 14.5 months for KRAS -wild-type/ TP53 -mutant, 14.6 months for KRAS -mutant/ TP53 -mutant, and 18.3 months for KRAS -wild-type/ TP53 -wild-type tumors ( p = 0.477). Conclusions: This study demonstrates the real-world outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer highlighting that poor performance status, advanced stage at presentation and patient attrition remain key challenges and newer therapies are needed to improve survival outcomes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

K

Kunal Naishadh Jobanputra

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

K

Kshitij Joshi

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

U

Udip Maheshwari

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

A

Ashish Joshi

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

V

Vashishth Maniar

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

P

Pritam Kalaskar

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Thane, India

S

Smit Sheth

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

P

Pradip Kendre

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

K

Krushna Chaudhari

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Indore, India

T

Taha Sethjiwala

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Indore, India

A

Akshay Shivchhand

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Kolhapur, India

P

Prakash Devde

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Chh. Sambhajinagar, India

C

Chandrashekhar Pethe

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nashik, India

S

Sonal Dhande

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nashik, India

D

Disha Morzaria

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

S

Shrenika Bhosale

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Mumbai, India

M

Mangesh ASHOK Mekha

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Pune, India

M

Makarand Randive

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Nagpur, India

R

Ritu Dave

MOC Cancer Care & Research Centre, Pune, India