Clinical and genomic predictors of outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EVP): UNITE study analysis.
Abstract
4560 Background: EVP is the recommended 1 st line (1L) therapy for pts with aUC and is moving into the perioperative setting. There is limited understanding of clinical factors and biomarkers predictive of EVP outcomes. Methods: We analyzed pts with aUC treated with EVP in the multi-site retrospective UNITE study. χ 2 test and logistic regression were used to assess observed response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from EVP start. Multivariable analysis (MVA) included age, sex, race, ECOG performance status (PS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), albumin, hemoglobin (Hgb), primary tumor site, histology, treatment line, and metastatic sites as covariates. Results: A total of 521 pts with aUC from 16 sites received EVP. Median age was 71, 75% were male, 81% were Caucasian, 76% had ECOG PS 0-1, and 72% were treated with 1L EVP. 74% had lower tract primary tumor, 65% pure urothelial histology, 18% liver metastases (mets), 43% non-liver visceral mets, and 28% lymph node (LN)-only mets. At 8.1 mos median follow-up from EVP start, the overall cohort had ORR 55%, DCR 82% [16% complete response (CR), 39% partial response (PR), 27% stable disease (SD)], median PFS (mPFS) 6.5 mos, and median OS (mOS) 19.8 mos. For 1L EVP pts, at 9.8 mos median follow-up, ORR was 59%, DCR 83% (20% CR, 39% PR, 24% SD), mPFS 10.1 mos, and mOS 23.3 mos. In both the overall cohort and 1L EVP pts, clinical factors associated with longer PFS and OS included ECOG PS 0-1, Caucasian race, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL, Hgb ≥ 10g/dL, NLR < 5, and absence of visceral mets. CR was associated with ECOG PS 0-1 (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-12.5, p = 0.02), Hgb ≥ 10g/dL (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, p = 0.02), NLR < 5 (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p = 0.002), LN-only mets (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.7-9.8, p = 0.003), immunotherapy-naive status (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4-17, p = 0.02), and 1L EVP for aUC (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-7.3, p = 0.001). Pts with CR had longer mPFS than pts with PR or SD (26.5 vs. 14.5 vs. 7.5 mos, p < 0.001) and longer mOS (NR vs. 33.4 vs. 14.5 mos, p < 0.001). Among 315 pts with molecular profiling, the most common alterations were in TERTp (55%), TP53 (45%), FGFR3 (22%), ARID1A (19%), KMT2D (18%), PIK3CA (18%), and CDKN2A/B (17%). In MVA, KMT2D alterations were associated with lower CR rate (6% vs. 19%, p = 0.05), shorter mPFS (5.0 vs. 8.0 mos, p = 0.04), and shorter mOS (12.0 vs. 20.0 mos, p = 0.04). Very high tumor mutational burden (≥ 15 mut/Mb) was associated with higher DCR (97% vs. 79%, p = 0.04) but no significant difference in PFS or OS. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort, ECOG PS, metastatic site, treatment line, and prior immunotherapy exposure were associated with EVP outcomes. KMT2D -altered aUC may represent a high-risk molecular subset with worse outcomes. Further validation in prospective cohorts is needed.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Elise Y. Cai
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Li Zhang
Kevin R. Reyes
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Zachariah Thomas
Cindy Y. Jiang
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Eugene Oh
Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School
Tanya Jindal
1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Jeffrey Yinhong Zhong
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Salvador Jamie Casas
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
Catherine Fahey
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Shilpa Gupta
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA
Sumit Shah
Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA
Arnab Basu
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Petros Grivas
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
Abhishek Tripathi
Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA
Jason Robert Brown
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Omar Alhalabi
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Irene Tsung
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Matthew T. Campbell
Vadim S. Koshkin
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA