Clinical and genomic predictors of outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab (EVP): UNITE study analysis.

E Elise Y. Cai (Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Li Zhang K Kevin R. Reyes (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) Z Zachariah Thomas C Cindy Y. Jiang (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) E Eugene Oh (Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School) T Tanya Jindal (1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) J Jeffrey Yinhong Zhong (Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH) S Salvador Jamie Casas (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA) C Catherine Fahey (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC) S Shilpa Gupta (Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA) S Sumit Shah (Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA) A Arnab Basu (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) P Petros Grivas (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA) A Abhishek Tripathi (Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA) J Jason Robert Brown (Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH) O Omar Alhalabi (Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) I Irene Tsung (Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) M Matthew T. Campbell V Vadim S. Koshkin (Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA)

Abstract

4560 Background: EVP is the recommended 1 st line (1L) therapy for pts with aUC and is moving into the perioperative setting. There is limited understanding of clinical factors and biomarkers predictive of EVP outcomes. Methods: We analyzed pts with aUC treated with EVP in the multi-site retrospective UNITE study. χ 2 test and logistic regression were used to assess observed response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from EVP start. Multivariable analysis (MVA) included age, sex, race, ECOG performance status (PS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), albumin, hemoglobin (Hgb), primary tumor site, histology, treatment line, and metastatic sites as covariates. Results: A total of 521 pts with aUC from 16 sites received EVP. Median age was 71, 75% were male, 81% were Caucasian, 76% had ECOG PS 0-1, and 72% were treated with 1L EVP. 74% had lower tract primary tumor, 65% pure urothelial histology, 18% liver metastases (mets), 43% non-liver visceral mets, and 28% lymph node (LN)-only mets. At 8.1 mos median follow-up from EVP start, the overall cohort had ORR 55%, DCR 82% [16% complete response (CR), 39% partial response (PR), 27% stable disease (SD)], median PFS (mPFS) 6.5 mos, and median OS (mOS) 19.8 mos. For 1L EVP pts, at 9.8 mos median follow-up, ORR was 59%, DCR 83% (20% CR, 39% PR, 24% SD), mPFS 10.1 mos, and mOS 23.3 mos. In both the overall cohort and 1L EVP pts, clinical factors associated with longer PFS and OS included ECOG PS 0-1, Caucasian race, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL, Hgb ≥ 10g/dL, NLR < 5, and absence of visceral mets. CR was associated with ECOG PS 0-1 (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-12.5, p = 0.02), Hgb ≥ 10g/dL (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, p = 0.02), NLR < 5 (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-5.3, p = 0.002), LN-only mets (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.7-9.8, p = 0.003), immunotherapy-naive status (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4-17, p = 0.02), and 1L EVP for aUC (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-7.3, p = 0.001). Pts with CR had longer mPFS than pts with PR or SD (26.5 vs. 14.5 vs. 7.5 mos, p < 0.001) and longer mOS (NR vs. 33.4 vs. 14.5 mos, p < 0.001). Among 315 pts with molecular profiling, the most common alterations were in TERTp (55%), TP53 (45%), FGFR3 (22%), ARID1A (19%), KMT2D (18%), PIK3CA (18%), and CDKN2A/B (17%). In MVA, KMT2D alterations were associated with lower CR rate (6% vs. 19%, p = 0.05), shorter mPFS (5.0 vs. 8.0 mos, p = 0.04), and shorter mOS (12.0 vs. 20.0 mos, p = 0.04). Very high tumor mutational burden (≥ 15 mut/Mb) was associated with higher DCR (97% vs. 79%, p = 0.04) but no significant difference in PFS or OS. Conclusions: In this large real-world cohort, ECOG PS, metastatic site, treatment line, and prior immunotherapy exposure were associated with EVP outcomes. KMT2D -altered aUC may represent a high-risk molecular subset with worse outcomes. Further validation in prospective cohorts is needed.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4560-4560
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

E

Elise Y. Cai

Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Li Zhang

K

Kevin R. Reyes

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Z

Zachariah Thomas

C

Cindy Y. Jiang

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

E

Eugene Oh

Krantz Family Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School

T

Tanya Jindal

1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

J

Jeffrey Yinhong Zhong

Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

S

Salvador Jamie Casas

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

C

Catherine Fahey

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

S

Shilpa Gupta

Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Taussig Cancer Institute Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA

S

Sumit Shah

Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford, CA

A

Arnab Basu

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

P

Petros Grivas

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

A

Abhishek Tripathi

Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA

J

Jason Robert Brown

Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

O

Omar Alhalabi

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

I

Irene Tsung

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

M

Matthew T. Campbell

V

Vadim S. Koshkin

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA