Clinical activity, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of ulviprubart in patients with T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia: Interim Results of A phase 1 trial

P Paul Shami (1University of Utah, Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Salt Lake City, United States) S Salvia Jain (2Jon and Jo Ann Hagler Center for Lymphoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA) L Lewis R Silverman (3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, United States) H H. Jeffrey Wilkins (4Chief Medical Officer, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States) K Kenneth Huttner (5Clinical Development, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States) M Michael McClain (6Associate Director, Clinical Operations, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States) D Dulce Soler-Ferran (7Vice President, Biology, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States) H Howard Liebman (13University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States) R Ryotaro Nakamura M Moaath Mustafa Ali (1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States) T Tapan Kadia (2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) E Eric Jacobsen (8Lymphoma Program, Department of Pharmacy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA)

Abstract

Abstract Background T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is a rare cause of anemia and neutropenia characterized by clonal expansion of cytotoxic CD8+CD57+ T cells. It is typically treated with immunosuppressants, however, significant off-target effects can limit treatment. CD8+CD57+ T cells can also express killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G member 1 (KLRG1), and depletion of KLRG1+ cells may be useful for the treatment of T-LGLL. Ulviprubart is an afucosylated monoclonal antibody specific for KLRG1. Here, we detail interim results of a phase 1/2 study of 21 subjects investigating the safety, tolerability, and activity of ulviprubart. Methods In this open-label, ascending dose, adaptive clinical trial, subjects received subcutaneous injections of ulviprubart at 0.25, 0.75, 1.5, or 3 mg/kg in five cohorts. Subjects were first dosed every 8 weeks (Q8W) in cohorts 1-3 at dosages of 0.25, 0.75, and 1.5 mg/kg. Cohorts 4 and 5 were dosed every 4 weeks (Q4W) at dosages of 1.5 and 3 mg/kg respectively. PK/PD and safety were regularly assessed.Data is presented for subjects who attained and maintained Q4W dosing at 1.5mg/kg or 3mg/kg for at least 12 weeks. Amelioration of neutropenia was defined as a 4-week ANC increase ≥ 50% from baseline and amelioration of anemia was defined as a 4-week Hgb increase ≥ 1 g/dL not attributable to transfusion or growth factor. Results 21subjects were enrolled. Mean age (range) was 57 (22,87) years, 14 were female, 20 presented with neutropenia and 12 with anemia. Only 1 treatment related SAE was reported (Grade 3 infusion related reaction hours after a 3 mg/kg dose and a blood transfusion that occurred before dosing). There were no discontinuations due to adverse events. 13 subjects achieved 12 weeks of Q4W dosing. Of these, all of whom had neutropenia at baseline, 7 (53%) had improvement of neutropenia of > 50% or greater than 1000 neutrophils/dL; of the 9 with anemia at baseline, 2 (22%) had increased hemoglobin of at least 1 g/dL. Pharmacodynamic response was variable. Of the 13 subjects evaluated, an effect of at least 50% depletion of CD8+CD57+ T cells was observed in 7 (54%); of these 7 subjects, 3 had a sustained depletion of > 90% and 4 had a sustained depletion of between 50-75%. 1 subject achieved a sustained depletion of 70% of the CD8+ KLRG1+ and CD8+ CD57+ KLRG1+ T cells, but this extent of depletion was not reflected in the respective parent populations of CD8+ and CD8+CD57+ T cells. 5 subjects did not achieve any significant level of depletion. Notably, of the 5 subjects without a significant PD effect, 2 had no detectable KLRG1 expression at baseline and 1 was profoundly lymphopenic. Conclusion In this small study, Q4W dosing of ulviprubart (1.5 or 3 mg/kg) was active in depleting cytotoxic KLRG1+ T cells and was well tolerated. There was a 53% response rate for patients with neutropenia and 22% response in patients with anemia with Q4 week dosing, supporting further clinical study.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 779-779
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

P

Paul Shami

1University of Utah, Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, Salt Lake City, United States

S

Salvia Jain

2Jon and Jo Ann Hagler Center for Lymphoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

L

Lewis R Silverman

3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, United States

H

H. Jeffrey Wilkins

4Chief Medical Officer, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States

K

Kenneth Huttner

5Clinical Development, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States

M

Michael McClain

6Associate Director, Clinical Operations, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States

D

Dulce Soler-Ferran

7Vice President, Biology, Abcuro, Inc., Newton, United States

H

Howard Liebman

13University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States

R

Ryotaro Nakamura

M

Moaath Mustafa Ali

1Cleveland Clinic, Internal Medicine, Cleveland, United States

T

Tapan Kadia

2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

E

Eric Jacobsen

8Lymphoma Program, Department of Pharmacy, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA