Clinical activity of novel targeting of S100A9 with tasquinimod for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Abstract
7555 Background: S100A9, a protein produced by myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the bone marrow microenvironment, promotes multiple myeloma (MM) progression and confers therapeutic resistance. Tasquinimod (tasq), an oral S100A9 inhibitor, has pre-clinical anti-myeloma effects alone and combined with proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulator (Imid) therapy (Cancer Res Commun 2023;3(3):420) and improved progression-free survival in prostate cancer patients (pts) (JCO 2016;34(22):2636-43). We previously reported preliminary results of a phase 1 trial of tasq alone and in combination with ixazomib (ixa), lenalidomide (len), and dexamethasone (dex) (IRd) in pts with RRMM (JCO 2023;41(16)suppl:8042; NCT04405167). For single-agent tasq, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 1 mg daily (qd) after a 1 week (wk) run-in at 0.5 mg qd. We now report updated results of tasq in combination with IRd. Methods: In dose escalation, pts were refractory, intolerant, or contraindicated to len, pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. In dose expansion, pts were refractory to the most recent Imid/PI combination or triple-class refractory. Tasq was given in 28-day cycles at 1 mg daily with either a 2 wk run-in (dose level 1: 0.25 mg qd x1 wk then 0.5 mg qd x1 wk) or a 1 wk run-in (dose level 2: 0.5 mg qd x1 wk). In dose escalation, pts received full doses of ixa (4 mg days 1/8/15), len (25 mg days 1-21, adjusted for renal dysfunction), and dex (40 mg qwk), but in dose expansion, doses of ixa, len, and dex were reduced per investigator discretion. Results: 16 pts received tasq with IRd at dose levels 1 (3 pts) and 2 (13 pts: 3 in escalation, 10 in expansion). Median age was 67 y (range 52-81); 75% were male; 19% were African American and 81% Caucasian. Pts had received median 7 prior lines of therapy (range 3-19), and all were triple-class refractory, with 81% (13 pts) refractory to their most recent Imid/PI combination. In dose escalation, no dose limiting toxicities were observed, and dose level 2 was the RP2D of tasq with IRd. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (10 pts: grade [gr] 3 in 1 pt), pain (9 pts: 0 gr ≥3), respiratory infection (9 pts: 4 gr 3, 2 gr 5), nausea/vomiting (8 pts: 0 gr ≥3), dyspepsia/gastritis (5 pts: 1 gr 3), and thrombocytopenia (5 pts: 1 gr 3, 3 gr 4). Among all 16 pts, there was 1 partial response (PR) and 7 minimal responses (MR). Among the 13 pts who were previously refractory to their most recent Imid/PI combination and would therefore not be expected to respond to the IRd backbone, there was 1 PR (lasting 20 months) and 5 MRs (lasting 1, 1, 2, 2, and 7 months). Conclusions: Tasquinimod, an S100A9 inhibitor, is well tolerated in combination with IRd and has anti-myeloma activity, as evidenced by responses in patients previously refractory to Imid/PI combination therapy. Further study is warranted of tasquinimod in combination with standard myeloma therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT04405167 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Dan T. Vogl
23Global Evidence and Outcomes (GEO), Data & Quantitative Sciences (DQS), Research & Development, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. (TDCA), Cambridge, MA
Yulia Nefedova
E. Paul Wileyto
1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Sara Whittington
4University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
Cynthia Diaczynsky
1University of Pennsylvania, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
Chau T. Nguyen
Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Inna Strakovsky
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Eva Bondesson
Active Biotech, Lund, Sweden
Helen Tuvesson
Active Biotech, Lund, Sweden
Erik Vahtola
Active Biotech, Lund, Sweden
Adam D. Cohen
Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sandra P. Susanibar-Adaniya
Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Adam J. Waxman
Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Shivani Kapur
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Alfred Garfall
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Edward A. Stadtmauer
Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA