Circulating tumor HPV-DNA dynamics and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without nivolumab in viral-mediated oropharyngeal cancer.

M Maha AT Elsebaie (University of Chicago, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, IL) E Evgeny Izumchenko A Aditya Juloori (Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) R Rohan Reddy Katipally (The University of Chicago, Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL) N Noura J. Choudhury (Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL) A Augustin Vannier (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) E Elizabeth A. Blair (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) F Frederick S. Jones (Sysmex Inostics, Inc., Baltimore, MD) A Anna Starus (Sysmex Inostics, Inc., Baltimore, MD) M Mark W. Lingen (University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL) N Nicole Cipriani (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) R Rifat Hasina (University of Chicago Department of Surgery, Chicago, IL) J John Cursio (4University of Chicago, Public Health Sciences, Chicago, United States) D Daniel J. Haraf (Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) A Alexander T. Pearson E Everett E. Vokes N Nishant Agrawal A Ari Joseph Rosenberg (Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL)

Abstract

6091 Background: Human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) is linked to favorable survival outcomes, prompting efforts to de-intensify treatment strategies. Circulating tumor HPV-DNA (ctHPV-DNA) is a promising biomarker for assessing treatment response and guiding de-escalation strategies. This study evaluates how patient characteristics influence ctHPV-DNA dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy across two de-escalation clinical trials. Methods: Patients with non-metastatic HPV+ OPC enrolled across two trials of neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel (NCT04572100) or carboplatin/ nab -paclitaxel/nivolumab (OPTIMA II, NCT03107182), with ctHPV-DNA available at baseline and post-neoadjuvant, were eligible. All participants received three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy followed by response-adapted de-escalated locoregional treatment. ctHPV-DNA values (copies per ml plasma) were measured at baseline and after 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, and percentage reductions were calculated. We defined “ctHPV-DNA clearance” as ≥ 95% reduction from baseline and compared data distribution between patients who achieved clearance and those who did not using Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson’s χ2, or Fisher’s exact tests. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) probabilities were compared using log-rank test. Results: The study included 84 patients . The mean age was 60.9 years. 93% of patients with neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy achieved ctHPV-DNA clearance compared to 82% with chemotherapy alone, p =0.298. Patients with T1-T2 tumors (AJCC 8 th edition) were significantly more likely to achieve ctHPV-DNA clearance compared to those with T3-T4 tumors ( p =0.0254). Age, race/ethnicity, smoking history, tumor site (e.g., tonsil), and risk group were not significantly associated with ctHPV-DNA clearance rates. ctHPV-DNA clearance by cycle 2-3 of neoadjuvant therapy predicted radiographic response per RECIST v1.1 ( p =0.001), and significantly improved OS ( p =0.025) and PFS ( p <0.001). Survival outcomes were similar across OPTIMA II and NCT04572100 as previously reported. Conclusions: Earlier T-stage tumors were associated with rapid ctHPV-DNA clearance by cycle 2 with a trend towards higher clearance rate with neoadjuvant nivolumab/chemotherapy. Rapid clearance predicts radiographic response, OS, and PFS, supporting ctHPV-DNA as a useful biomarker for treatment monitoring with neoadjuvant treatment in HPV+ OPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03107182 . ctHPV-DNA % reduction between baseline and follow up at cycle 2-3. ≥ 95% reductionN (%) < 95% reductionN (%) p Age, (mean ± sd) 60.4 ± 10 61.3 ± 8.5 0.656 Gender (Male) 59 (86.8) 9 (13.2) 1 Race (Caucasian) 54 (86) 9 (14) 0.583 Risk (High) 34 (92) 3 (8) 0.309 T1 stage 12 (75) 4 (25) 0.0254 T2 stage 30 (97) 1 (3) T3 stage 8 (89) 1 (11) T4 stage 3 (60) 2 (40) Tumor shrinkage (median %, range) -64.2 (-23, -100) -42 (-14, -71) 0.001

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 6091-6091
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

M

Maha AT Elsebaie

University of Chicago, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Chicago, IL

E

Evgeny Izumchenko

A

Aditya Juloori

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

R

Rohan Reddy Katipally

The University of Chicago, Radiation Oncology, Chicago, IL

N

Noura J. Choudhury

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL

A

Augustin Vannier

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

E

Elizabeth A. Blair

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

F

Frederick S. Jones

Sysmex Inostics, Inc., Baltimore, MD

A

Anna Starus

Sysmex Inostics, Inc., Baltimore, MD

M

Mark W. Lingen

University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL

N

Nicole Cipriani

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

R

Rifat Hasina

University of Chicago Department of Surgery, Chicago, IL

J

John Cursio

4University of Chicago, Public Health Sciences, Chicago, United States

D

Daniel J. Haraf

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

A

Alexander T. Pearson

E

Everett E. Vokes

N

Nishant Agrawal

A

Ari Joseph Rosenberg

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL