Circulating tumor DNA response adapted treatment de-escalation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CT-READ).

A Abdul Qadar (University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK) S Syed Saqib Balkhi (Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK) R Ranjit Babu Jasaraj (University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK) A Abhirami Das (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK) K Kelly Lynn Stratton (University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK) M Michael Cookson (University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK) S Sanjay Patel (Heart Research Institute; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia) A Andrew G. McIntosh (University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK) J Jonathan Heinlen (Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK) A Adanma Ayanambakkam (Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK)

Abstract

TPS907 Background: Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains a lethal disease remains an aggressive malignancy with a 5-year survival rate below 10% despite recent therapeutic advances. The phase III EV-302 trials established the combination of pembrolizumab (P) and enfortumab vedotin (EV) as the first-line (1L) standard of care, demonstrating a median overall survival (OS) of 31.5 months and progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.5 months. However, ≥Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occur in more than half of treated patients, frequently necessitating dose interruptions or discontinuations. Notably, sustained clinical benefit is often observed following EV discontinuation, suggesting that some patients may achieve durable disease control with reduced treatment intensity. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a dynamic, minimally invasive biomarker of tumor burden and treatment response. Retrospective longitudinal analyses in patients with mUC treated with P+EV have demonstrated the prognostic and predictive value of ctDNA dynamics. (6) Specifically, ≥50% reductions in ctDNA levels have been independently associated with improved PFS and OS, supporting ctDNA as a robust, real-time biomarker to inform response-adapted, biomarker-driven therapeutic de-escalation strategies. Methods: This single-institution, single-arm, open-label, phase II pilot trial (NCT06313666) evaluates ctDNA-guided PEV de-escalation in patients with untreated mUC. Eligible Patients will receive standard 1L PEV for 8 cycles. Plasma ctDNA is measured every 12 weeks using a tumor-informed multiplex PCR assay. Patients achieving ≥50% ctDNA reduction at 6 months and without radiographic progression discontinue EV and continue pembrolizumab monotherapy every 6 weeks until progression or toxicity. EV rechallenge is permitted at progression. Primary endpoints are 3- and 6-month PFS post-de-escalation. A Simon two-stage minimax design (n = 30; 21 expected to de-escalate) will be used; the study will be considered positive if ≥7 patients remain progression-free at 3 months. Secondary and correlative endpoints include correlation of ctDNA dynamics with imaging-based response and clinical outcomes, ctDNA clearance kinetics, and neuropathy evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT06313666 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

A

Abdul Qadar

University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

S

Syed Saqib Balkhi

Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK

R

Ranjit Babu Jasaraj

University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

A

Abhirami Das

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

K

Kelly Lynn Stratton

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

M

Michael Cookson

University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK

S

Sanjay Patel

Heart Research Institute; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

A

Andrew G. McIntosh

University of Oklahoma Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

J

Jonathan Heinlen

Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

A

Adanma Ayanambakkam

Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK