Circulating tumor DNA kinetics as a biomarker of response to enfortumab-pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma.

M Muhammad Abdullah Humayun (1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States) J Japneet Kaur Oberoi (1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Phoenix, United States) C Claire Yee (Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States) N Naif A. Ganadily (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ) M Muhammad Ali Khan P Prateek Jain (Sinai Hospital Baltimore, Baltimore, MD) A Arnab Basu (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) A Andrew Zganjar (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) D Daniel S. Childs J Jacob Orme (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) A Adam McLain Kase (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) M Mark Tyson (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) Y Yousef Zakharia (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA) I Irbaz Bin Riaz (Irbaz Bin Riaz, MD, PhD; R. Bryan Rumble, MSc; Thomas A. Hope, MD; Giuseppe Procopio, MD; and Neha Vapiwala, MD; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) P Parminder Singh (Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ)

Abstract

703 Background: The association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) reduction with treatment response has been investigated across multiple malignancies. This study aims to assess the impact of ctDNA response on survival outcomes in patients receiving enfortumab-pembrolizumab (EV-P). Methods: We identified 32 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received EV-P and had ≥2 ctDNA assessments with ≥1 detectable level. Deep molecular response was defined as >2-log reduction from highest ctDNA detection. Radiographic progression was determined from radiology reports documenting progression by RECIST criteria. Kaplan Meier analyses were performed to compute Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for radiographic progression free survival (rPFS), defined as time from treatment start to radiographic progression or death and overall survival (OS) defined as time from treatment start to death were computed. Log-rank tests were performed to compare PFS and OS in patients with deep molecular response to those without response. A p-value <0.05 indicated a statistically significant association with response. Results: Thirty-two patients were included (median age 71 years; range 39–90). Median follow-up was 10.6 months. At cutoff (10/1/2025), 26 patients were alive and 6 had died. Seventeen (53%) achieved a ≥2-log ctDNA reduction (responders), while 15 (47%) did not (non-responders). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in responders (log-rank P < 0.001); median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI 2.4–NR) in non-responders and not reached in responders (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.44; P = 0.0026). Median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI 10.0–NR) in non-responders versus not reached in responders (log-rank P = 0.011; HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.88; P = 0.037). At cutoff, 94% of responders and 67% of non-responders were alive. Conclusions: Achieving a >2-log decrease in ctDNA during EV + Pembrolizumab therapy was significantly associated with improved progression free and overall survival. These findings support ctDNA kinetics as a potential early biomarker of response warranting prospective validation. Clinical outcomes by >2-log ctDNA reduction status. Endpoint > 2-log drop (n = 17 ≤ 2-log drop (n = 15) Log-rank p Median (mo) ≤ 2-log > 2-log HR (95% CI) P C-index PFS 2 events (12%) 10 events (67%) 0.0002 5.9 (2.4–NA) NR 0.09 (0.02–0.44) 0.0026 0.77 OS 1 event (6%) 6 events (40%) 0.011 12.7 (10.0–NA) NR 0.11 (0.01–0.88) 0.037 0.73

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 703-703
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

M

Muhammad Abdullah Humayun

1Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, United States

J

Japneet Kaur Oberoi

1Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Phoenix, United States

C

Claire Yee

Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

N

Naif A. Ganadily

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ

M

Muhammad Ali Khan

P

Prateek Jain

Sinai Hospital Baltimore, Baltimore, MD

A

Arnab Basu

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

A

Andrew Zganjar

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

D

Daniel S. Childs

J

Jacob Orme

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

A

Adam McLain Kase

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

M

Mark Tyson

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

Y

Yousef Zakharia

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Mayo Clinic Phoenix Arizona USA

I

Irbaz Bin Riaz

Irbaz Bin Riaz, MD, PhD; R. Bryan Rumble, MSc; Thomas A. Hope, MD; Giuseppe Procopio, MD; and Neha Vapiwala, MD; Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

P

Parminder Singh

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ