Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with stage 2/3 HR+HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in the I-SPY2 endocrine optimization pilot (EOP) trial.

S Silver Alkhafaji (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) M Mark Jesus M Magbanua (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Laura van t Veer (Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) K Karthik Giridhar (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) M Matthew P. Goetz R Rita Mukhtar (Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) C Christos Vaklavas (Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) A Anthony D. Elias (University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO) M Mei Wei G Gillian L. Hirst H Hope S. Rugo (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA) L Laura Ann Huppert (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) W W. Fraser Fraser Symmans (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX) A Alexander D. Borowsky L Lamorna Brown Swigart (University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA) N Natsuko Onishi (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) D Douglas Yee N Nola Hylton (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Laura Esserman (Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) J Jo Chien (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA)

Abstract

3008 Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of ctDNA analysis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage high-risk breast cancer. Few studies have characterized ctDNA in pts receiving NET for early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- BC that is predicted to benefit less from chemotherapy. Methods: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 432 plasma samples from 108 pts enrolled in the I-SPY2 EOP trial. Pts had Stage 2/3 HR+/HER2-, MammaPrint low or high risk 1 BC. Pts were randomized to one of 7 neoadjuvant-based treatment arms including arms containing AI, Z-endoxifen, Lasofoxifene, vepdegestrant (ARV-471), and Abemaciclib. Pts were treated for 6 months prior to surgery. Blood was collected at baseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3). A personalized ctDNA test (Signatera) was designed to detect up to 16 patient-specific mutations (from whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor) in cfDNA by ultra-deep sequencing. The chi-square test was used to assess associations between categorical variables, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in medians. Results: ctDNA information was available for 101 patients at baseline (T0) (Table 1). At T0, 36 (35.6%) patients were ctDNA-positive. 23/36 (63.9%) became ctDNA-negative and 13/36 (36.1%) remained ctDNA-positive. At T0, 65/101 patients (64.4%) were ctDNA-negative. Of these, 57 (87.7%) remained negative, while 8 (12.3%) became ctDNA-positive at T1 before reverting to ctDNA-negative. A higher percentage of ctDNA-positive patients at T0 were cN+ compared to ctDNA-negative pts (p = 0.036, 64% vs. 40%). Additionally, ctDNA-positivity at T0 was strongly associated with higher Ki67 (p = 0.03) and larger functional tumor volume by MRI at baseline (p = 0.03). T3/T4 and high-grade tumors at baseline were also associated with having ctDNA positivity at baseline, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.34 and 0.058, respectively). Conclusions: In this study of pts with Stage 2/3 HR+ HER2- BC with largely MammaPrint low risk signatures, over one-third of pts had detectable ctDNA at baseline. Detectable ctDNA at baseline was associated with cN+ disease, larger FTV, and high baseline Ki67. The majority of pts with positive ctDNA at baseline cleared the ctDNA on NET. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 . Clinicopathologic characteristics of EOP patients. All Patients(N=101) Age at screening 55 (27-80) years* Clinical N Stage Node+ (cN+) 49 (48.5%) Node- (cN-) 52 (51.5%) SET status High 84 (83.2%) Low 14 (13.9%) Missing 3 (2.97%) MammaPrint (MP) risk** High risk 1 (H1) 15 (14.9%) Low risk 86 (85.1%) *Mean(min-max). **H1: MP score between 0 and -0.57; low: MP score between 0 and 0.355.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 3008-3008
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Silver Alkhafaji

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

M

Mark Jesus M Magbanua

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Laura van t Veer

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

K

Karthik Giridhar

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

M

Matthew P. Goetz

R

Rita Mukhtar

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

C

Christos Vaklavas

Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

A

Anthony D. Elias

University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

M

Mei Wei

G

Gillian L. Hirst

H

Hope S. Rugo

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

L

Laura Ann Huppert

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

W

W. Fraser Fraser Symmans

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX

A

Alexander D. Borowsky

L

Lamorna Brown Swigart

University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

N

Natsuko Onishi

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

D

Douglas Yee

N

Nola Hylton

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Laura Esserman

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

J

Jo Chien

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA