Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with stage 2/3 HR+HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in the I-SPY2 endocrine optimization pilot (EOP) trial.
Abstract
3008 Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of ctDNA analysis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage high-risk breast cancer. Few studies have characterized ctDNA in pts receiving NET for early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- BC that is predicted to benefit less from chemotherapy. Methods: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 432 plasma samples from 108 pts enrolled in the I-SPY2 EOP trial. Pts had Stage 2/3 HR+/HER2-, MammaPrint low or high risk 1 BC. Pts were randomized to one of 7 neoadjuvant-based treatment arms including arms containing AI, Z-endoxifen, Lasofoxifene, vepdegestrant (ARV-471), and Abemaciclib. Pts were treated for 6 months prior to surgery. Blood was collected at baseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3). A personalized ctDNA test (Signatera) was designed to detect up to 16 patient-specific mutations (from whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor) in cfDNA by ultra-deep sequencing. The chi-square test was used to assess associations between categorical variables, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate differences in medians. Results: ctDNA information was available for 101 patients at baseline (T0) (Table 1). At T0, 36 (35.6%) patients were ctDNA-positive. 23/36 (63.9%) became ctDNA-negative and 13/36 (36.1%) remained ctDNA-positive. At T0, 65/101 patients (64.4%) were ctDNA-negative. Of these, 57 (87.7%) remained negative, while 8 (12.3%) became ctDNA-positive at T1 before reverting to ctDNA-negative. A higher percentage of ctDNA-positive patients at T0 were cN+ compared to ctDNA-negative pts (p = 0.036, 64% vs. 40%). Additionally, ctDNA-positivity at T0 was strongly associated with higher Ki67 (p = 0.03) and larger functional tumor volume by MRI at baseline (p = 0.03). T3/T4 and high-grade tumors at baseline were also associated with having ctDNA positivity at baseline, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.34 and 0.058, respectively). Conclusions: In this study of pts with Stage 2/3 HR+ HER2- BC with largely MammaPrint low risk signatures, over one-third of pts had detectable ctDNA at baseline. Detectable ctDNA at baseline was associated with cN+ disease, larger FTV, and high baseline Ki67. The majority of pts with positive ctDNA at baseline cleared the ctDNA on NET. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 . Clinicopathologic characteristics of EOP patients. All Patients(N=101) Age at screening 55 (27-80) years* Clinical N Stage Node+ (cN+) 49 (48.5%) Node- (cN-) 52 (51.5%) SET status High 84 (83.2%) Low 14 (13.9%) Missing 3 (2.97%) MammaPrint (MP) risk** High risk 1 (H1) 15 (14.9%) Low risk 86 (85.1%) *Mean(min-max). **H1: MP score between 0 and -0.57; low: MP score between 0 and 0.355.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Silver Alkhafaji
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Mark Jesus M Magbanua
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Laura van t Veer
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Karthik Giridhar
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Matthew P. Goetz
Rita Mukhtar
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Christos Vaklavas
Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Anthony D. Elias
University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
Mei Wei
Gillian L. Hirst
Hope S. Rugo
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
Laura Ann Huppert
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
W. Fraser Fraser Symmans
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX
Alexander D. Borowsky
Lamorna Brown Swigart
University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
Natsuko Onishi
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Douglas Yee
Nola Hylton
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Laura Esserman
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Jo Chien
University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA