Circulating tumor cells predict myeloma outcomes in patients treated with daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone
Abstract
Abstract Circulating tumor cells (CTC) represent a high-risk biomarker in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, their prognostic value among transplant-eligible (TE) patients receiving daratumumab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-VRd) remains unknown. In this study, we analyzed CTC in the phase 3 PERSEUS/EMN017 trial. TE-NDMM patients were randomized (1:1) to D-VRd with daratumumab/lenalidomide maintenance (D-VRd group) or bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide maintenance (VRd group), both with transplant. A subset of 451 of 709 patients from PERSEUS (D-VRd, 231/355; VRd, 220/354) had screening blood samples collected for CTC analysis by flow cytometry. CTC were detected in 370 patients (82%; median limit of detection, 0.0004%). CTC were prognostic of progression-free survival (PFS), independent of other factors, as a continuous (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15-1.60]; P< .001) and categorical variable (≥0.175% CTC-high, optimal threshold). D-VRd improved PFS vs VRd in CTC-low patients (4-year rates: 88% vs 74%; HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.25-0.70]; P = .0013). Regardless of study treatment, minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates were lower in CTC-high vs CTC-low patients (10–5: 52.2% vs 66.2%; 10–6: 34.8% vs 52.4%). D-VRd significantly increased MRD-negativity rates vs VRd among CTC-high (10–5: 69.4% vs 33.3%; 10–6: 47.2% vs 21.2%; both P< .05) and CTC-low patients (10–5: 74.4% vs 57.8%; 10–6: 65.6% vs 38.5%; both P< .001), with similar observations for sustained MRD-negativity. CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor in TE-NDMM treated with standard-of-care frontline quadruplet. D-VRd improved and sustained MRD-negativity rates in CTC-high and CTC-low, and improved PFS for CTC-low with a positive trend in CTC-high patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03710603.
Article Details
Authors (26)
Luca Bertamini
Cathelijne Fokkema
1Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Paula Rodriguez-Otero
Mark van Duin
1Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Evangelos Terpos
Mattia D’Agostino
4Division of Hematology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Vincent H. J. van der Velden
2Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Niels W. C. J. van de Donk
Michel Delforge
Christoph Driessen
Roman Hajek
Hermann Einsele
Annette Vangsted
13Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Diego Vieyra
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Ricardo Attar
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Anna Sitthi-Amorn
14Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Robin Carson
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Fredrik Schjesvold
Pawel Robak
14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland
Meral Beksac
Andrew Spencer
Annemiek Broijl
1Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Tom Cupedo
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
Philippe Moreau
Mario Boccadoro
Pieter Sonneveld