Circulating kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with divergent histologies (RCCdh): Biomarker analysis of the CAN-I trial.
Abstract
538 Background: The CAN-I trial was a multi-center single arm phase II trial that evaluated cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab for treatment of metastatic RCCdh (NCT04413123). Previous studies have shown that circulating KIM-1 is associated with prognosis in clear cell RCC and that changes in KIM-1 are associated with treatment response. Preclinical data has shown that KIM-1 is overexpressed in most RCCdh except those that have a non-proximal tubular cell of origin, such as chromophobe RCC. We evaluated whether KIM-1 is associated with histology and outcomes in RCCdh. Methods: Patients with RCCdh were treated with cabozantinib, nivolumab and ipilimumab as previously described. Plasma KIM-1 was evaluated at baseline and cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1) using an established enzyme based electrochemiluminescence assay. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between KIM-1 levels and outcomes. Results: Of 59 patients enrolled, 43 had plasma available for analysis. Median baseline KIM-1 was 3040 pg/mL (IQR: 842–8512) among patients with non-chromophobe RCC and 63 (IQR: 31–83) among patients with chromophobe RCC (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.0001). Higher KIM-1 at baseline was associated with worse IMDC risk score (Spearman rho = 0.37, p = 0.015). Among non-chromophobe RCC patients with paired samples (n=28), KIM-1 at C3D1 was significantly lower compared to baseline (median: 2900 vs 1232 pg/mL, Wilcoxon paired test, p = 0.002) and was strongly prognostic for PFS and OS after adjustment for IMDC risk and histology (Table). The 12-month OS rate from C3D1 was 83% among non-chromophobe patients who had decreasing KIM-1, and 37% among patients who had increasing KIM-1. Conclusions: Among patients with RCCdh, KIM-1 was overexpressed in papillary, translocation, and unclassified RCC compared to chromophobe RCC. Among non-chromophobe RCCdh patients, circulating KIM-1 is a potentially useful dynamic biomarker and should be further evaluated in trials. Circulating KIM-1 and association with outcomes. Baseline KIM-1 C3D1 KIM-1*** Hazard Ratio*(95% CI) P-value Hazard Ratio*(95% CI) P-value Unadjusted (PFS) 1.26 (0.97, 1.65) 0.088 1.53 (1.18, 1.98) 0.001 Adjusted (PFS)** 1.29 (0.94, 1.79) 0.118 1.55 (1.16, 2.07) 0.003 Unadjusted (OS) 1.23 (0.88, 1.70) 0.223 1.58 (1.20, 2.08) 0.001 Adjusted (OS)** 1.19 (0.79, 1.78) 0.413 1.66 (1.17, 2.34) 0.004 *Per unit log increase; **Adjusted for IMDC risk score and histology type (papillary vs other); ***Landmark analysis from C3D1.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Wenxin Xu
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Clara Steiner
University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Liliana Ascione
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Morgan Paul
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Data Science, Boston, United States
Wanling Xie
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Xiaowen Liu
Stephanie A. Berg
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Mehmet Asim Bilen
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
David A. Braun
Tian Zhang
Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Hans J. Hammers
UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
David F. McDermott
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
Toni K. Choueiri
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Bradley Alexander McGregor
Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA