Chiral Self‐Sorting Assembly of Au <sub>16</sub> Rings for Cancer Therapy via Enantioselectivity‐Induced Ferroptosis and Apoptosis
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chirality‐induced biochemical response has emerged as a prominent research focus. This research demonstrates the chiral self‐sorting assembly of atomically precise Au 16 supramolecular rings via aurophilic interactions. Enantiomers ( M R,R M’ R,R )‐Au 16 Cl 8 and ( P S,S P’ S,S )‐Au 16 Cl 8 are fabricated through homochiral self‐sorting assembly and are unaffected by anion types. But the chiral self‐sorting assembly of ( M R,R M’ A,A )‐Au 16 (PF 6 ) 8 and ( P S,S P’ A,A )‐Au 16 (PF 6 ) 8 in a heterochiral system is influenced by anion types. Crucially, ( M R,R M’ R,R )‐Au 16 Cl 8 displayed superior in vitro antitumor efficacy with IC 50 = 0.812 ± 0.002 µM against 4T1 cells compared to ( P S,S P’ S,S )‐Au 16 Cl 8 enantiomer. This enantioselectivity stems from asymmetric glutathione (GSH)‐catalyzed decomposition of chiral supramolecular Au 16 rings in the tumor microenvironment (apparent kinetic constants: k M = 14.97 × 10 −5 min −1 × M −1 vs. k P = 8.56 × 10 −5 min −1 × M −1 at 8 mM GSH), releasing the thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) inhibitor dppm 2 Au 2 Cl 2 . The chiral Au 16 rings induce dual cell death via TrxR‐inhibition‐mediated apoptosis and GPX4‐suppression‐driven ferroptosis, validated by ROS (reactive oxygen species) accumulation, lipid peroxidation and caspase‐3 activation. ( M R,R M’ R,R )‐Au 16 Cl 8 (20 mg/kg) achieved 55.4% tumor growth inhibition in 4T1‐bearing mice with no detectable organ toxicity, outperforming auranofin in biosafety. This work establishes chiral self‐sorting Au 16 assemblies as promising platforms for enantioselective cancer therapy with high efficacy and low toxicity.
Article Details
Authors (13)
Jiaqiao Li
State Key Laboratory of Materials Low‐Carbon Recycling Center of Excellence for Environmental Safety and Biological Effects Beijing Key Laboratory For Green Catalysis and Separation Department of Chemistry College of Chemistry and Life Science Beijing University of Technology Beijing China
Fengyan Song
State Key Laboratory of Materials Low‐Carbon Recycling Center of Excellence for Environmental Safety and Biological Effects Beijing Key Laboratory For Green Catalysis and Separation Department of Chemistry College of Chemistry and Life Science Beijing University of Technology Beijing China
Ji Liu
Yifei Chen
Jianing Zhang
Department of Land Resources and Urban Development Management, School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University
Mingyi Cao
Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Engineering China Pharmaceutical University Jiangning China
Xiang‐Ming Zeng
MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Sciences School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing P. R. China
Minjian Wu
Yuting Miao
Liao‐Yuan Yao
MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Sciences School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing P. R. China
Shu‐Yan Yu
State Key Laboratory of Materials Low‐Carbon Recycling Center of Excellence for Environmental Safety and Biological Effects Beijing Key Laboratory For Green Catalysis and Separation Department of Chemistry College of Chemistry and Life Science Beijing University of Technology Beijing China
Zhenwei Yuan
Department of Biomedical Engineering School of Engineering China Pharmaceutical University Jiangning China
Ben Zhong Tang
School of Science and Engineering, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Aggregate Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Longgang, Shenzhen 518172, Guangdong, P. R. China