China’s post-zero-COVID Omicron wave: A Bayesian analysis
Abstract
Following the late 2022 transition from its “dynamic zero-COVID” policy, China experienced a major nationwide severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron wave. To characterize the wave’s transmission dynamics, we used a Bayesian framework to fit a deterministic transmission model to two key data streams: reported COVID-19 daily case counts preceding the policy shift (up to November 11, 2022) and weekly virological and influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance data afterward (through February 12, 2023). We estimated a nationwide cumulative infection attack rate reaching 87.8% (95% CrI: 75.9 to 93.3%) by mid-February 2023. Notably, 84.1% of the population became infected within just 1 mo following the full policy relaxation on December 7. The estimated time-varying effective reproduction number peaked at 5.69 (95% CrI: 4.56 to 6.85) on December 8, 2022. Although transmission intensity increased during the Spring Festival travel rush (Chunyun), widespread population immunity prevented a subsequent wave. Prior to the Chunyun period, distinct relationships emerged: Estimated transmission rates showed a significant positive correlation with long-term population behavioral response coefficient (reflecting cumulative infections; Pearson correlation: ρ = 0.92, P < 0.001), while mobility patterns correlated positively with short-term behavioral response coefficient (reflecting current infection prevalence; Pearson correlation: ρ = 0.87, P < 0.001). These dynamic behavioral associations, which we further validated against empirical data on keyword search and media coverage, then weakened during the Chunyun period. In summary, this analysis quantifies Omicron’s transmission potential and highlights the importance of incorporating time-varying behavioral factors into epidemic models to accurately describe transmission dynamics, especially during periods of abrupt policy change.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (9)
Jun Cai
School of Physical Science and Technology
Yanpeng Wu
Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University
Hengcong Liu
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Fudan University
Zhu Deng
Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong
Lan Yi
Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University
Liuhe Lai
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Fudan University
Anna Funk
Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University
Marco Ajelli
Laboratory for Computational Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health
Hongjie Yu
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Fudan University