Children and adolescents with sickle cell disease demonstrate improved health-related quality of life and low decisional regret after hematopoietic cell transplantation: A sickle cell transplant advocacy and research alliance (STAR) study
Abstract
Abstract Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD) has steadily increased, however data on long-term effects is limited. Previous registry studies focused on survival, rejection and GVHD. Data on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) post-HCT in SCD is limited by small sample sizes and short follow-up. The objective of Project Sickle Cure (PSC) is to measure HRQoL and decisional regret (DR) in children with SCD, hypothesizing that HCT will improve HRQoL longitudinally with low rates of DR. PSC is a prospective observational multicenter study of SCD participants undergoing allogeneic HCT. Since 2021, 15 STAR sites in North America have enrolled 89 participants, with 65 having >6 mo post-HCT follow-up and included in this analysis. Baseline demographics, disease, and HCT characteristics were collected and summarized. Participants and their primary caregivers complete HRQoL measures (PedsQL Generic Core [GC], PedsQL Family Impact Module [FIM], and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS]) measures alongside a new DR Scale (DRS; higher scores indicate greater regret). Data are collected pre-HCT and post-HCT at 30, 90, and 180 days (d) and 1, 2, and 3 years (yrs). General linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate preliminary changes over time. Results are presented as least-square means (LSM) and differences in least-square means (ΔLSM) from baseline. In this interim exploratory analysis, no statistical adjustments to p-values (e.g., alpha spending or corrections for multiple testing) were applied; results may differ after full enrollment and completion of planned analyses. Mean duration of follow up was 2.3 yrs (SD=1.0), with 85% >1 yr post-HCT. Participants were 46% male with mean age at HCT of 10.1 yrs (SD=5.3). Most had HbSS genotype (94%), and disease severity was severe, less severe, and mild in 35%, 35%, and 30%, respectively. Donor was matched related in 75%, bone marrow graft source in 68%, and conditioning was myeloablative in 53%, reduced intensity in 38%, and nonmyeloablative in 9%. Acute GVHD of any severity was reported in 34%, and any chronic GVHD in 5%. Many participantshad significant improvement from baseline in multiple domains of HRQoL, some with sustained improvement and from the earliest timepoint. For PedsQL GC, patient (pt) and parent-proxy HRQoL significantly increased from LSM=71.7 and 73.7 at baseline starting d 180 and 1 yr to 78.3 and 81.2 by yr 2, respectively (pt ΔLSM (95% CI)=6.6 (0.6,12.6), p=.032; parent-proxy ΔLSM (95% CI)=7.5 (0.1,14.9), p=.046). For PedsQL FIM, parent-reported total family functioning significantly increased from baseline of LSM=76.3 to 88.3 starting d 180 to yr 3 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=12.1 (2.9, 21.2), p=.011). Patient PROMIS scores significantly improved from baseline for anxiety (starting d 30) and fatigue up to yr 1 (anxiety ΔLSM (95% CI) =-6.0 (-10.5,-1.5), p=.009; fatigue ΔLSM (95% CI)=-6.8 (-12.4,-1.2), p=.019), as well as mobility from yr 2 to yr 3 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=7.2 (0.3,14.1), p=.040) and pain interference from yr 1 up to yr 2 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=-7.9 (-14.8, -1.0), p=.024). Parent-proxy scores significantly improved from baseline up to yr 3 for anxiety (from d 180; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-8.6 (-15.4,-1.8), p=.013), fatigue (from 1 yr; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-9.2 (-16.1,-2.3), p=.009), mobility (from yr 2; ΔLSM (95% CI)=6.6 (1.3,12.0), p=.016), and pain interference (from d 90; ΔLSM (95% CI)=-11.0 (-17.8,-4.2), p=.002). Pt and parent-proxy depression did not significantly differ from baseline. Though pt peer relationship scores significantly decreased from baseline to d 180 (ΔLSM (95% CI)=-4.8 (-9.1,-0.4),p=.031), all scores remained above cut-off for impairment. For DRS, pt and parent-proxy scores indicated low regret up to yr 3 (LSM=17.5 and 11.2, respectively), which did not significantly differ from baseline at d 90. Most PROMIS HRQoL scores were normal pre-HCT in our cohort. Previous studies with smaller sample sizes have demonstrated both low and high baseline scores. However, it is the favourable change from baseline which is of greater relevance to patients and providers. In conclusion, our interim analysis demonstrated significant improvements in multiple domains of HRQoL at longitudinal timepoints, as early as 30 d and lasting up to 3 yrs post-HCT with low DR. Our findings are strengthened by our large cohort, duration of follow-up and the use of diverse measures, including a novel DRS.
Article Details
Authors (27)
Gregory Guilcher
1University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Oncology and Pediatrics, Calgary, Canada
Jenny Duong
2University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Stephen Sands
3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Araby Roberts
4University of Calgary, Oncology, Calgary, Canada
Scott Gillespie
Katie Liu
5Pediatric Biostatistics Core, Emory University School of Medicine, Pediatrics, Atlanta, United States
Staci Arnold
6Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, United States
Jonathan Bardahl
7Riley Children's Health/Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
Christine Camacho-Bydume
8Hackensack Medical Center, Hackensack, United States
Emi Caywood
13Nemours/Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, United States
Ashley Chopek
14Manitoba Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Lev Gorfinkel
1Boston Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Boston, United States
Ann Haight
12Children's Healthcare of Atlanta/Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, United States
John Horan
10Golisano Children's Hospital, Rochester, United States
Monica Hulbert
14Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology, Boston, United States
Kimberly Kasow
15National Marrow Donor Program, Member, Donor, Product Operations, Minneapolis, United States
Naresh Kumar
James LaBelle
16University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, United States
Emily Meier
1Pfizer Inc, New York, United States
Alexander Ngwube
18Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
Robert Nickel
4Children's National Medical Center, Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Washington, United States
Timothy Olson
9Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Cell Therapy and Transplant Section, Division of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
Mahvish Rahim
28Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplant, Bronx, United States
Akshay Sharma
Khaled Yassine
18Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States
Elizabeth Stenger
6Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, United States
Fiona Schulte
4University of Calgary, Oncology, Calgary, Canada