Chemotherapy use among women < 50 years with node-negative early-stage hormone receptor–positive breast cancer with intermediate OncotypeDX 21-gene recurrence score: A National Cancer Database analysis.

N Nerea Lopetegui-Lia (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) Y Yevgeniya Gokun A Ashley Pariser Davenport (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) A Arya Mariam Roy M Mitali Shah (The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) E Erin Burke T Therese Youssef Andraos (The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Doreen Marie Agnese (Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Department of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH) H Heather Marie LeFebvre (The Ohio State University- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) B Brandon Slover (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) M Margaret E. Gatti-Mays (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Daniel G. Stover (Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus) S Sara Myers (The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH)

Abstract

e12546 Background: The Oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) multigene assay is widely-used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions in early-stage hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). As RS does not explicitly account for the key prognostic factors of age or menopausal status, its use among premenopausal women < 50 years with intermediate scores (16–25) remains unclear. Specifically, while CT benefit may increase toward the upper end of this range, the magnitude of benefit has not been clearly defined. To this end, we sought to examine CT treatment patterns among women < 50 years with node-negative BC and intermediate RS utilizing National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: This retrospective NCDB analysis queried data from 2018-2022 for patients < 50 years (surrogate for premenopausal status) and clinically and pathologically node negative (pN0) stage I-III HR+ HER2-negative BC who underwent upfront surgery and had RS 16-25. Intermediate RS was further categorized using two subgroups: 16-20 and 21-25. Multivariable binary logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between clinical factors and receipt of CT stratified by each RS subgroup. Results: Data from 3,586 premenopausal women with pN0 and intermediate RS were analyzed: 2,382 patients had RS 16-20 and 1,204 had RS 21-25. A greater proportion of patients with RS 21-25 received CT compared to RS 16-20 (49.2% vs 10.6%, p < .001). Among those with RS 16-20, older age (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94), higher pathologic tumor stage (aOR 6.33, 95% CI 2.90–13.82, pT3/4 vs pT1/2), higher grade disease [i.e. moderately (vs well) differentiated (aOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.34–2.67); poorly (vs well) differentiated vs (aOR 5.17, 95% CI 3.27–8.16)], and residing > 50 miles from the treatment facility (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11-2.94) were associated with greater odds of CT receipt. While most of those factors were also associated with CT receipt among those with RS 21-25, distance from treatment facility did not retain significance for this cohort. Conclusions: Among women < 50 years with pN0 and intermediate RS, CT receipt was strongly associated with clinicopathologic factors for scores 16-20 and 21-25. These findings indicate that even in node-negative disease, clinicopathological factors continue to be accounted for in guiding CT decisions and are considered alongside RS when individualizing treatment in this population.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

N

Nerea Lopetegui-Lia

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

Y

Yevgeniya Gokun

A

Ashley Pariser Davenport

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

A

Arya Mariam Roy

M

Mitali Shah

The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

E

Erin Burke

T

Therese Youssef Andraos

The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Doreen Marie Agnese

Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Department of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH

H

Heather Marie LeFebvre

The Ohio State University- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

B

Brandon Slover

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

M

Margaret E. Gatti-Mays

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Daniel G. Stover

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus

S

Sara Myers

The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH