Chemotherapy use among women < 50 years with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer with low (≤15) Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

M Mitali Shah (The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) Y Yevgeniya Gokun A Ashley Pariser Davenport (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) A Arya Mariam Roy E Erin Burke T Therese Youssef Andraos (The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) B Brandon Slover (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) H Heather Marie LeFebvre (The Ohio State University- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Doreen Marie Agnese (Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Department of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH) M Margaret E. Gatti-Mays (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Daniel G. Stover (Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus) S Sara Myers (The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) N Nerea Lopetegui-Lia (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH)

Abstract

544 Background: RxPONDER demonstrated a benefit to chemotherapy (CT) in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) with 1-3 pathological positive lymph nodes (pN1) regardless of Oncotype DX RS. Whether the benefit is due to the cytotoxic effects of CT itself or potentially from the CT-induced ovarian suppression remains to be determined. In the absence of large prospective data evaluating the predictive ability of RS in this population, including pN1mi, we sought to examine adjuvant CT use patterns among premenopausal women and low RS. Methods: This retrospective analysis queries the NCDB from 2018-2022 for patients (pts) with BC <50 years old (surrogate for premenopausal status) and clinically node negative disease at the time of diagnosis. Pts with stage I-III HR+ HER2-negative BC who underwent upfront curative breast surgery and had pathologically confirmed lymph node status (pN) were included. Oncotype DX RS was categorized as low if RS ≤15. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to examine associations between clinical-pathological factors and the receipt of adjuvant CT. Results: 6040 pts with Oncotype DX RS ≤15 met inclusion criteria. Most pts, 5090 (84.3%), had invasive ductal carcinoma, and high (>51%) ER and PR expression (>93% of patients). Among all low RS, 5081 (84.4%) had pN0 and 939 (15.5%) had pN1 or higher disease, 704 pts (76.6%) having 1 LN involved, of which 317 pts were pN1mi; 148 (16.1%) had 2 LN and 67 (7.3%) had 3+ LN. Accounting for all pts, 265 (4.4%) received CT: 64 (24.2%) were pN0, while 201 (75.8%) were pN1+. Among pts with pN1 BC, older age was associated with lower odds of receiving adjuvant CT (aOR 0.96, 95%CI 0.93-1.00, p=0.03). Other factors including higher pathologic tumor stage (pT3/T4 vs pT1/T2; aOR 4.46, 95% CI 2.34–8.51), higher pN involvement, specifically 2 LN (aOR 2.45, 95% CI 1.60–3.75) and ≥3 LN (aOR 4.65, 95% CI 2.54–8.51) compared to 1 positive regional LN, and poorly (vs well) differentiated tumor (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.14–4.88) had higher odds of receiving CT. Similarly, pts with pN0 and low RS that had pT3/T4 tumors (aOR 3.99, 95% 1.16-13.72) and higher grade (moderately and poorly differentiated tumors) had higher odds of receiving CT (aOR 1.84 95% CI 1.03-3.27 and 6.11 95% CI 2.58-14.44, respectively). Conclusions: Among women <50 years with low RS (≤15), CT receipt was strongly associated with clinicopathologic risk factors, including higher tumor stage, poorly differentiated grade and higher regional nodal involvement. These findings indicate that despite a low RS, young age and node positivity are associated with adjuvant CT recommendation. These results highlight the importance of ongoing trials such as OFSET, which aims to better answer the appropriateness of CT among premenopausal women.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 544-544
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

M

Mitali Shah

The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

Y

Yevgeniya Gokun

A

Ashley Pariser Davenport

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

A

Arya Mariam Roy

E

Erin Burke

T

Therese Youssef Andraos

The Ohio State University, James Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

B

Brandon Slover

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

H

Heather Marie LeFebvre

The Ohio State University- The James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Doreen Marie Agnese

Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital Department of Surgical Oncology, Columbus, OH

M

Margaret E. Gatti-Mays

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Daniel G. Stover

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus

S

Sara Myers

The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

N

Nerea Lopetegui-Lia

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH