Chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 in advanced PD-L1–negative squamous cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
e20586 Background: Squamous cell lung carcinoma (sqNSCLC) accounts for 25-30% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and is associated with poor prognosis. Although the addition of anti-PD(L)1 immunotherapy to chemotherapy improves survival in all-comers with advanced sqNSCLC, the true benefit of chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 in patients with advanced PD-L1–negative sqNSCLC is unclear. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized clinical trials comparing chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 to chemotherapy with or without placebo in locally advanced (ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation or surgery) or metastatic PD-L1–negative sqNSCLC. Results: A total of 1,548 patients with advanced PD-L1–negative sqNSCLC from 11 studies were included: IMpower131, RATIONALE 307, ORIENT-12, CameL-Sq, GEMSTONE-302, CheckMate 227 Part 1, KEYNOTE-407, Empower-Lung 3, ASTRUM-004, AK105-302, and POSEIDON.Of these patient, 810 (52%) received chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 (intervention group), while 738 (48%) received chemotherapy with or without placebo (control group). All included studies used platinum-doublet chemotherapy regimens. Chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 was associated with an increased probability of overall response rate (risk ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.16-1.60; P < 0.001; Cochran's Q test P-value = 0.25; I² = 24%), increased progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.48-0.69; P < 0.001; Cochran's Q test P-value = 0.05; I² = 49%), and increased overall survival (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; P = 0.02; Cochran's Q test P-value = 0.24; I² = 24%) compared to chemotherapy, with or without placebo. We observed high inter-study heterogeneity in the PFS meta-analysis, likely attributable to differences in the prevalence of liver metastases at baseline, which is a known poor prognostic factor in this patient population. However, when studies were stratified based on the prevalence of liver metastases at baseline ( < 15% vs. > 15% of patients), the heterogeneity was resolved in the PFS meta-analysis for both subgroups. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of combination anti-PD-(L)1 plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with advanced PD-L1–negative sqNSCLC. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether dual checkpoint inhibition, with or without chemotherapy, is superior to anti-PD-(L)1 plus chemotherapy in this population.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Nicolas Peruzzo
MedStar Health Georgetown University, Baltimore, MD
Gabriel Lenz
Ted Akhiwu
Department of Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD
Mariah Malak Bilalaga
MedStar Health Georgetown University, Baltimore, MD
Greeshma Nihitha Gaddipati
MedStar Health Georgetown University, Baltimore, MD
Nathalia Luisy Farias Müller
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Palhoça, SC, Brazil
Jincong Q. Freeman
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
Fernando Castilho Venero
Hospital Moinhos De Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Marcelo Corassa
Thoracic Oncology Unit, Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Andrés Felipe Cardona Zorrilla
Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC), Bogotá, Colombia and Consorcio Latinoamericano para la Investigación del Cáncer de Pulmón (CLICAP), Bogotá, Colombia
Joshua E. Reuss
Georgetown University, Washington, DC
Bruna Pellini