Chemokines as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

S Shipra Gandhi (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) S Sachin Kumar Deshmukh (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) S Sharon Wu (Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) J Joanne Xiu G Gregory B. Lesinski C Chrystal M. Paulos B Brian J. Czerniecki (Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL) P Pavani Chalasani S Song Yao M Marc S. Ernstoff (NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Developmental Therapy Program, Bethesda, MD) S Saranya Chumsri (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) D Dario Trapani J Jose Pablo Leone (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) M Maryam B. Lustberg (Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) G George W. Sledge K Kevin Kalinsky (Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta) P Pawel Kalinski

Abstract

1106 Background: TNBC, although an aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtype, is highly immunogenic and the only BC subtype where the ICI pembrolizumab is approved. However, predictive biomarkers for pembrolizumab benefit are limited. The chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 attract CD8 + T cells into the tumor microenvironment (TME) and are associated with chemotherapy benefit, but little is known about their role in prediciting pembrolizumab benefit in TNBC. We investigated the association of CXCL9 , CXCL10 and their cognate receptor CXCR3 with TME and ICI efficacy. Methods: 3,038 TNBC samples were analyzed via NGS (592-gene panel, NextSeq; WES/WTS, NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) totaled somatic mutations per tumor (high > 10 mt/MB). Immune cell fractions were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 -high (H) and -low (L) tumors were classified by RNA expression above or below the 50th percentile. Real-world overall survival (OS) was derived from insurance claims and calculated from start of pembrolizumab to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U with multiple comparison adjustments (q < .05). Results: TNBC expressed higher levels of CXCL9 and CXCL10 (median (TPM): 5.3 and 14.7) compared to N = 1,082 HER2+ (4.8 and 10.3, p < 0.05) and N = 4,918 HR+HER2- (2.7 and 7, q < .05) BC. CXCR3 expression was higher in TNBC compared to HR+HER2- (1.9 vs 1.7, q < .05), but no difference when compared to HER2+ (1.9 vs 2, q = 0.97) BC. CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 -H TNBC had higher median OS post pembrolizumab [ CXCL9 -H vs -L: 26.5 vs 15.7 months (mo), HR: 0.65 (95% CI 0.5-0.84); CXCL10 -H vs -L: 26.0 vs 20.6 mo, HR 0.74 (0.57-0.95); CXCR3 -H vs -L: 32.6 vs 18.3 mo, HR 0.68 (0.52-0.88), all p < 0.05 ]. CXCL9 -H, CXCL10 -H and CXCR3 -H had higher PD-L1 positivity (22C3), TMB high, higher T cell inflamed score, TP53 mutations, elevated B and CD8 + T cells infiltration, but not neutrophils, and higher expression of immune checkpoint genes (Table). Conclusions: High CXCL9 / CXCL10 / CXCR3 expression is associated with longer survival in patients with TNBC post pembrolizumab, and characterized by an immune-enriched TME. Further investigation is needed to evaluate this chemokine axis in TNBC and its potential as a therapeutic target to enhance ICI efficacy. TME characteristics by CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCR3 expression. CXCL9 CXCL10 CXCR3 High Low q-value High Low q-value High Low q-value PD-L1 % 54 14 <.05 54 14.7 <.05 49 19 <.05 TMB high % 14.3 8 <.05 12.6 9.7 <.05 12.4 9.8 <.05 B cell (median %) 4.4 3.5 <.05 4.3 3.6 <.05 5 3.4 <.05 CD8+T cell (median %) 1.2 0 <.05 1 0 <.05 1.3 0 <.05 Neutrophil (median %) 4.2 4.5 <.05 4.2 4.4 <.05 4.2 4.3 0.2 T cell inflamed score 100 -84 <.05 98 -84 <.05 108 -100 <.05 CTLA4 (median TPM) 3.2 0.7 <.05 3 0.8 <.05 3.4 0.7 <.05 LAG3 (median TPM) 6.6 2.1 <.05 6.9 2 <.05 6.8 2 <.05 TP53 mutation % 88 81 <.05 90.5 78.6 <.05 86 83 0.08

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1106-1106
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

S

Shipra Gandhi

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

S

Sachin Kumar Deshmukh

Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ

S

Sharon Wu

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

J

Joanne Xiu

G

Gregory B. Lesinski

C

Chrystal M. Paulos

B

Brian J. Czerniecki

Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

P

Pavani Chalasani

S

Song Yao

M

Marc S. Ernstoff

NCI Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Developmental Therapy Program, Bethesda, MD

S

Saranya Chumsri

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

D

Dario Trapani

J

Jose Pablo Leone

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

M

Maryam B. Lustberg

Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

G

George W. Sledge

K

Kevin Kalinsky

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta

P

Pawel Kalinski