Cerebrospinal fluid derived ctDNA and CTC based molecular analysis highlighting the sampling proximity for clinical significance.

M Mohan Uttarwar (1Cell.Ai, Foster City, CA) V Vijay Maruti Patil (Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India) B Bharat Bhosale (Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India) A Atul Bharde (1Cell.Ai, Pune, India) G Ganesh Khutale (Actorius Innovation and Research, Pune, India) M Madhura Basavalingegowda (1Cell.Ai, Mumbai, India) S Saloni S. Andhari (Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA) A Alain D'Souza (OneCell Dx, Mumbai, India) A Aarthi Ramesh (1Cell.Ai, Pune, India) R Richa Dave (OneCell Dx, Pune, India) K Kanchan Hariramani (OneCell Dx, Pune, India) V Vrushali Khobragade (OneCell Dx, Pune, India) A Aravindan Vasudevan (Actorius, Mumbai, India) A Atul Thatai (MAx Healthcare, Delhi, India) S Sandeep Batra (17Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University Health, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, United States) S Sajjan Rajpurohit (BLK- Max Hospital, Delhi, India) B Bhuvan Chugh (Max Hospital, Delhi, India) J Jayant Khandare (Actorius Innovations and Research Co, Simi Valley, CA) K Kumar Prabhash (Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Adult Solid Tumor Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India) G Gowhar Shafi (1Cell.Ai, Mumbai, India)

Abstract

e14012 Background: ctDNA based liquid biopsies have transformed cancer care by enabling the detection of actionable mutations, monitoring progression, therapy response, and prognosis. Cerebrospinal (CSF) fluid-based liquid biopsies (CSF-LBx) for CtDNA and CTC may offer a promising alternative, providing critical insights into the molecular landscape of brain metastases. We demonstrate, CSF-LBx with precise detection of ctDNA, having clinically significant markers especially metastasis settings, including leptomeningeal mets. In addition we paired samples having both CSF and blood for ctDNA. Further we captured true single circulating tumor cells (sCTCs), CTCs in paired CSF and in peripheral blood samples. Methods: In a retrospective study, we isolated both ctDNA and CTCs in 11 paired blood and CSF samples having brain metastasis. Patients were presented with, lung with brain and liver mets, multifocal glioblastoma, lobular breast, relapsed cerebellar medulloblastoma, NSCLC, Ca Ovary, lung with medulloblastoma, low grade glioma, etc. Further, CTCs were isolated using OncoDiscover CDSCO India approved platform having anti EpCAM antibody, and sCTCs were captured and released using OncoIndx Ikon platform. Further, OncoIndx comprehensive NGS assay was performed with 1080 genes. Results: In a retrospective we evaluated 11 brain metastatic patients who had paired samples having both CSF and blood. 6 patients had 2 or more sample points. A total of 30 CTCs were isolated from CSF, compared to 42 CTCs isolated from blood. Notably, two CTC clusters were identified in CSF, compared to 10 clusters observed in blood. While ctDNA was isolated from both CSF and blood. NCCN based actionable mutations were identified in 45% (n = 5) of CSF ctDNA samples and 36.36% (n = 4) of blood ctDNA samples. Treatment resistance mutations in the EGFR, ERBB2, PIK3CA, and CDKN2A/2B genes were observed in 4 CSF samples, while sensitive mutations were detected in both CSF and blood. CSF-ctDNA revealed more actionable mutations, including both sensitive and resistance mutations, compared to blood alone in patients in leptomeningeal metastasis. The absence of resistance drivers in blood underscores the importance of sampling more proximally to the metastatic site to improve survival outcomes. Conclusions: CSF has great potential to analyse, both ctDNA and CTC and sCTCs enrichment for molecular profiling. CSF ctDNA exhibited NCCN based actionable mutations, in particular, in cases such as glioblastoma, where tissue biopsies are often not feasible, and blood-based diagnostics face limitations due to DNA sensitivity. Further studies to establish sensitivity and specificity is desired.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

M

Mohan Uttarwar

1Cell.Ai, Foster City, CA

V

Vijay Maruti Patil

Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India

B

Bharat Bhosale

Holy Spirit Hospital, Mumbai, India

A

Atul Bharde

1Cell.Ai, Pune, India

G

Ganesh Khutale

Actorius Innovation and Research, Pune, India

M

Madhura Basavalingegowda

1Cell.Ai, Mumbai, India

S

Saloni S. Andhari

Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA

A

Alain D'Souza

OneCell Dx, Mumbai, India

A

Aarthi Ramesh

1Cell.Ai, Pune, India

R

Richa Dave

OneCell Dx, Pune, India

K

Kanchan Hariramani

OneCell Dx, Pune, India

V

Vrushali Khobragade

OneCell Dx, Pune, India

A

Aravindan Vasudevan

Actorius, Mumbai, India

A

Atul Thatai

MAx Healthcare, Delhi, India

S

Sandeep Batra

17Riley Children's Hospital, Indiana University Health, Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, United States

S

Sajjan Rajpurohit

BLK- Max Hospital, Delhi, India

B

Bhuvan Chugh

Max Hospital, Delhi, India

J

Jayant Khandare

Actorius Innovations and Research Co, Simi Valley, CA

K

Kumar Prabhash

Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Adult Solid Tumor Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

G

Gowhar Shafi

1Cell.Ai, Mumbai, India