Ceralasertib (cerala) + olaparib (ola) in patients (pts) with homologous recombination repair (HRR)-deficient platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (OC) after progression on prior PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment (tx).

R Rene Lynnette Roux (Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom) S Sophie Postel-Vinay M Mario Campone (Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Angers-Nantes, Saint-Herblain, France) A Antoine Italiano (Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) C Claire Frances Friedman (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) M Myong Cheol Lim R Rowan Miller (National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI); Barts Health NHS Trust; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom) G Geoffrey Ira Shapiro (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) M Matthew G. Krebs G Graeme Parr (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) C Conor Norris (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) D Daniel Slade (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) N Natalia Lukashchuk J Jyoti Nehra (AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA) O Olga Murina (Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) E Edit Eva Lukacs (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) I Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard (Centre Léon Bérard, Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer de Lyon, Lyon, France)

Abstract

5542 Background: Combining an ATR inhibitor (ATRi) and a PARPi may overcome acquired PARPi resistance based on preclinical and clinical data. We report a Phase 1 study (NCT02264678) of cerala (ATRi) + ola (PARPi) in pts with HRR-deficient OC who had progressed on prior PARPi tx. Methods: Pts had histologically confirmed high-grade serous/endometrioid epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, with deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA or HRR mutations ( BRCA m ; HRRm: RAD51C/D m , PALB2 m) or HRR-deficiency (HRD+). Pts received oral cerala 80 mg (d 1–14 every 28 d) + ola 150 mg (throughout) twice daily without/with (Cohort [Co] 1/2) intervening platinum-based tx after initial response and subsequent progression on prior PARPi tx. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability; ORR per RECIST v1.1 and PFS were secondary endpoints. Emergence of PARPi resistance mechanisms was analyzed in archival/pre-study tx tissue samples. Results: 32 pts were treated, 30 in Co1 (7 ongoing tx at data cutoff: Mar 5, 2024) and 2 in Co2 (cohort closed early). Median age was 63.0 yrs; 68.8% (22/32) had BRCA m/HRRm and 31.3% (10/32) HRD+/non- BRCA m by local assessment. All pts had adverse events (AEs); 40.6% had grade ≥3 AEs (most common were anemia and platelet count reduced, each 21.9%); 6.3% discontinued tx due to AEs. Table shows efficacy in Co1. 24 pts had post-PARPi biopsies evaluable for genomics analysis: 3 (12.5%) had BRCA reversions (rev; 13 pts were BRCA m); 3 (12.5%) had loss of function alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) rewiring genes. Of 16 pts with post-PARPi biopsies evaluable for RAD51 foci, 81.3% (13) had RAD51 high status suggesting HRR functional proficiency as a prevalent PARPi resistance mechanism; of these 13, 61.5% (8; 80% CI, 40.2–79.9) responded to cerala + ola, while no responses occurred in 3 RAD51 low pts (80% CI, 0.0–53.6). Responders included patients with BRCA rev or TP53BP1 m, indicating cerala + ola activity in pts with BRCA rev and alterations in DDR rewiring genes. Other PARPi resistance mechanisms were rare. Conclusions: In this setting of high unmet need, cerala + ola had acceptable safety, a low discontinuation rate, and clinical activity in both BRCA m/HRRm and HRD+/non- BRCA m pts after progression on a prior PARPi. Exploratory analyses highlighted emerging PARPi resistance mechanisms; ongoing assessments of PARPi resistance to inform pt selection and novel combination strategies in post-PARPi settings will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02264678 . BRCA m/HRRm n=20 HRD+/non- BRCA m n=10 Total N=30 ORR, % (80% CI) 45 (29.3–61.5) 30 (11.6–55.2) 40 (27.7–53.3) Best response, n (%) Complete 2 (10) 1 (10) 3 (10) Partial 7 (35) 2 (20) 9 (30) Stable 8 (40) 4 (40) 12 (40) PFS Events, n 10 8 18 Median, months (80% CI) 7.5 (5.3–not calculable) 4.5 (1.8–5.3) 5.5 (4.7–7.5)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5542-5542
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

R

Rene Lynnette Roux

Department of Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom

S

Sophie Postel-Vinay

M

Mario Campone

Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Angers-Nantes, Saint-Herblain, France

A

Antoine Italiano

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

C

Claire Frances Friedman

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

M

Myong Cheol Lim

R

Rowan Miller

National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI); Barts Health NHS Trust; University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom

G

Geoffrey Ira Shapiro

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

M

Matthew G. Krebs

G

Graeme Parr

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

C

Conor Norris

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

D

Daniel Slade

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

N

Natalia Lukashchuk

J

Jyoti Nehra

AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA

O

Olga Murina

Translational Medicine, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

E

Edit Eva Lukacs

AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

I

Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard

Centre Léon Bérard, Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer de Lyon, Lyon, France