Central nervous system involvement in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort study from the spanish geltamo group
Abstract
Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon but clinically significant event, often associated with poor prognosis. Prior studies have offered important insights, yet data from large, unselected real-world populations remain scarce. We report findings from one of the largest multicenter cohorts of MCL patients in Spain, aimed at characterizing CNS involvement and comparing clinical outcomes—including treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)—between patients with and without CNS infiltration. Patients and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 1,162 MCL patients diagnosed in Spain (GELTAMO-MCL-2022). Among them, 60 patients (5.2%) had CNS involvement, either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease, while 1,102 had no evidence of CNS infiltration. Data from participating centers encompassed baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, response rates, and survival outcomes. PFS and OS were analyzed and compared between groups. Results The crude incidence of CNS involvement was 5.2%, with 1.4% at the time of diagnosis. For patients who developed CNS relapse later (not at diagnosis), the median time from initial diagnosis to CNS involvement was 15.10 months (IQR 7.47–34.14). CNS localization was leptomeningeal in 70%, parenchymal in 16%, and both in 14%. Baseline characteristics, including established high-risk features, were compared between patients with and without CNS involvement. Sex distribution (male 73% in both; p=0.9), age >65 years (47% vs. 53%; p=0.2), and extranodal disease (p=0.3) were similar between groups. In contrast, high-risk baseline features such as high-risk MIPI (77% vs. 44%; p=0.001), blastoid/pleomorphic variant (45% vs. 16%; p=0.001), and Ki-67 >30% (80% vs. 49%; p=0.001) were significantly more frequent in patients with CNS involvement. First-line intensive regimens including high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) were given to 48% with CNS involvement versus 36% without (p=ns). BTK inhibitors were used as a frontline treatment in 8% overall, but none of the CNS patients. Early progression of disease (ePOD) was more frequent with CNS involvement (72% vs. 51%; p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, CNS involvement at diagnosis was an independent adverse factor for OS (HR 3.25; 95% CI: 1.62–6.52; p<0.001) and PFS (HR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.45–3.01; p=0.001). Other independent predictors of OS were age >65 (HR 2.04; p<0.001), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.72; p=0.003), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.63; p=0.001). For PFS, age (HR 1.39; p=0.016), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.45; p=0.014), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.39; p=0.007) were significant; blastoid morphology showed a trend toward significance (HR 1.30; p=0.056). Treatment with HIDAC was not an independent predictor of survival, neither for OS nor for PFS. Median OS from diagnosis was 1.41 years (95% CI: 1.19–NA) for patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis (n=16) versus 7.5 years (95% CI: 6.92–8.4) for those without (p=0.001). Median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI: 2.89–NA) versus 42.1 months (95% CI: 36.6–47.0), respectively (p=0.012). In patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis, high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) did not significantly improve OS or PFS. Median OS was 1.41 years with HIDAC and 1.30 years without it (HR 2.08; p=0.277), while median PFS was 16.4 vs 9.6 months, respectively (HR 1.51; p=0.504). Similarly, first-line consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation had no significant impact on survival. When calculated from the time of CNS involvement, patients with CNS disease at diagnosis had significantly worse outcomes compared to those with CNS relapse, with a median PFS of 3.5 vs 18.0 months (HR 3.00; 95% CI: 1.36–6.59; p=0.006) and median OS of 1.5 vs 0.19 years (HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.36–6.69; p=0.006). Conclusions In this large Spanish multicenter cohort, CNS involvement in MCL—although a rare complication both at diagnosis and at relapse—was associated with markedly poorer PFS and OS. It remained an independent adverse prognostic factor alongside age, high-risk MIPI, and Ki-67. CNS infiltration at diagnosis was the strongest predictor of poor outcome, while occurrence during disease evolution conferred an even worse prognosis. These findings highlight the need for early identification and tailored therapeutic approaches for high-risk patients.
Article Details
Authors (40)
Mariana Bastos-Oreiro
9Department of Hematology, Gregorio Marañón Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
Alba Cabirta
1Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
Amanda Perez
4Hospital Clínico Universitario de Barcelona, Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
Ana Saus Carreres
3Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Sonia González De Villambrosia
70Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
Marta Canelo
6Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Hematology, Badalona, Spain
Ana Maria Garcia-Noblejas Moya
17Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Beatriz De La Cruz Benito
8Hospital Universitario La Paz, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Paola Villafuerte Gutiérrez
33Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Fatima De la Cruz Vicente
5Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
Juan Carlos Caballero
12Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
Ana Jiménez-Ubieto
12Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Daniel García Belmonte
45Hospital Sanitas La Zarzuela, Madrid, Spain
Ana Muntanola Prat
33Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
Eva Gonzalez Barca
12Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
Hugo Daniel Luzardo Henríquez
11Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Hematology, Gran Canaria, Spain
Eduardo Rios Herranz
12Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme, Hematology, Sevilla, Spain
Alejandro Martin Garcia-Sancho
Carlos Grande
Concepción Nicolás
Antonio Gutiérrez
Marina Gomez-Llobell
1Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Jose Angel Hernandez Rivas
3University Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
Blanca Sánchez-González
23Hospital del Mar (Hospital Universitario), Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
Ainara Ferrero Campos
24Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Hematology, Lleida, Spain
Rosalia Alonso Trillo
26Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Eva Donato
27Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Hematology, Valencia, Spain
Silvia Rocio Verdesoto Cozzarelli
30Hospital Universitario Moisés Broggi, Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
Sandra Suarez Ordoñez
31Hospital Universitario Complejo Hospitalario de Vigo, Hematology, Vigo, Spain
Emilia Pardal De La Mano
22Hospital Virgen del Puerto, Plasencia, Spain
Pilar Gomez Prieto
10Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
Amparo Avaría
33Hospital Universitario IVO de Valencia, Hematology, Valencia, Spain
Lucia Villalon Blanco
37Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Hematology, Madrid, Spain
Alicia Roldán-Pérez
19Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain
Raúl Córdoba
Juan-Manuel Sancho
36Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol-ICO-Badalona, Hematology, Barcelona, Spain
Eva Giné
Víctor Navarro Garces
3Statistics Unit, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Barcelona, Spain
Pau Abrisqueta
Ana Marin Niebla
1Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hematology, Barcelona, Spain