CD83 CAR T overcome CD19 antigen loss in B cell malignancies after CD19-directed therapy
Abstract
Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) targeting CD19 can cure approximately a third of patients with aggressive B cell malignancies, but relapse due to CD19 antigen loss and serious infections resulting from B cell aplasia remain major causes of death following CD19 CAR T. Here, we demonstrate that CD83 is a clinically relevant target for CAR T therapy in patients with B cell malignancies and that CD83 CAR T can effectively kill tumors even in the context of CD19 antigen loss. CD83 was highly expressed on B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n=40, 43% of lymphoblasts CD83+), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n=5, 69% of lymphoma cells CD83+), and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=2, 80% of lymphoma cells CD83+), yet low on healthy B cells (16% of B cells CD83+; n=9 healthy donors). In contrast, CD19 was expressed on B cell malignancies and circulating B cells alike (96-100% of leukemia/lymphoma or B cells CD19+). Focusing on ALL, CD83 antigen density was 10 times lower than CD19 (1051 vs 10882 MESF, ANOVA, P=0.0001), but similar to CD20 or CD22. Therefore, CD83 CAR T therapy for B cell leukemia or lymphoma carries a low risk for B cell aplasia and related infectious complications, otherwise observed with CD19 CAR T. In a cohort of B ALL patients treated with CD19-directed therapy (n=6, including brexucabtagene autoleucel or blinatumomab), CD19 antigen expression on lymphoblasts was significantly reduced upon relapse. Conversely, CD83 antigen was well expressed on B ALL lymphoblasts at diagnosis and relapse (99% to 24% of lymphoblasts CD19+, P=0.0012; 30% to 48% of lymphoblasts CD83+, P=0.3918, mixed-effects analysis). B ALL CD19 expression is susceptible to selective pressure when subjected to anti-CD19 therapy, like CAR T or bispecific engagers. The persistent expression of CD83 on B ALL lends itself toward a form of targeted rescue therapy. CD83 CAR T effectively killed Raji (94.1% of cells CD83+) and Nalm6 (99.4% of cells CD83+) cell lines, often outperforming CD19 CAR T, especially against CD19 knock-out Raji targets. When cocultured with Raji target cells, CD83 CAR T produced more IFNγ (2665 v 3319 pg/ml, P=0.0001) and less IL-6 (53 v 20 pg/ml, P=0.0001) than CD19 CAR T. Thus, the target cell-stimulated CD83 CAR T displayed a cytokine profile favoring potency over toxicity, compared to CD19 CAR T. The CD83 CAR T product consisted of a rich central memory population and expressed significantly less PD-1, suggesting a propensity toward durable persistence and resistance to exhaustion. In NSG mice bearing luciferase-transduced Raji tumors, CD19 or CD83 CAR T monotherapy significantly extended survival compared to untreated mice (n=7-8 mice per group, median survival 24 vs 51.5 [P=0.0003] or 40.5 [P=0.0035] days, respectively). To mimic the expected clinical scenario of using CD83 CAR T in an era of commercial cell products, we tested the sequential use of CD83 CAR T after the initial infusion of CD19 CAR T in the Raji model. The sequential CD19=>CD83 CAR T approach resulted in superior mouse survival compared to either cell product alone (median survival undefined at 60 days, with 75% of mice alive, P=0.03, Log-rank test). Sequential CD19=>CD83 CAR T cleared the tumor burden in treated mice by day +48. Our preclinical evidence justifies further translational investigation of CD83 CAR T in B cell leukemia and lymphoma, as a strategy to overcome the complications of B cell aplasia and CD19 antigen loss.
Article Details
Authors (13)
Brian Betts
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Constanza Savid-Frontera
Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
Shannon McSain
Kelly Walton
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Nolan Beatty
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Payal Goala
Shernan Holtan
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Meredith Stone
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Frederick Locke
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Hematology and Oncology, Tampa, United States
ANNE EATON
University of Minnesota, Shoreview, Minnesota, United States
Michael Linden
3University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
Renier Brentjens
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States
Marco Davila
1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, United States