Cavity‐Engineered Polycrystalline Cathodes Resolve Stress Concentration Problem in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries
Abstract
ABSTRACT The development of all‐solid‐state lithium metal batteries (ASSLMBs) has pushed beyond the energy density limit of conventional liquid systems. However, stress concentration remains a critical yet poorly understood cause of degradation in ASSLMBs, particularly in widely used polycrystalline (PC) Ni‐rich cathode systems. Herein, we design cavity‐contained PC LiNi 0.9 Co 0.05 Mn 0.05 O 2 (NCM) cathode particles to resolve the stress concentration problem in particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale by bottom‐up stress management. Synchrotron x‐ray tomography and multiscale finite element simulations disclose the cathode reaction heterogeneity initiates stress concentration and particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale mechanical‐electrochemical degradation. Compared to cavity‐free and multi‐cavity NCM, central‐cavity NCM suppressed cracking within the particles through shortened ionic transport distances and a built‐in stress‐relief space, enhanced (de)lithiation depth and uniformity at the cathode, reduced porosity and fracture in the electrolyte, and inhibited lithium dendrite formation at the anode, suggesting significantly improved stress uniformity in particle‐electrode‐battery levels. Consequently, ASSLMBs using the central‐cavity NCM deliver a superior cycling stability (86.4% after 200 cycles and 81.5% after 400 cycles), outperforming both the traditional cavity‐free NCM (51.6% after 200 cycles) and highly anticipated single crystal NCM (44.2% after 400 cycles). This work links particle‐electrode‐battery multiscale mechanical‐electrochemical behavior, providing valuable insights for designing ASSLMBs with long lifespan from a holistic perspective.
Article Details
Authors (21)
Tianpeng Huang
Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao China
Yue Zheng
State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University
Jun Ma
Shu Zhang
Fu Sun
Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology
Kejian Wang
Markus Osenberg
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, 14109 Berlin, Germany
André Hilger
Henning Markötter
Department of Non‐Destructive Testing Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und ‐Prüfung Berlin Germany
Ingo Manke
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1, Berlin 14109, Germany
Fabian Wilde
Institute of Materials Physics Helmholtz‐Zentrum Hereon Geesthacht Germany
Zhiwei Hu
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Nothnitzer Strasse 40, Dresden 01187, Germany
Xiaoyu Shen
Chang‐Yang Kuo
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China
Chien‐Te Chen
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan, Republic of China
Xiaogang Wang
Pengxian Han
Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao 266101 China
Su‐Yang Hsu
National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center Hsinchu Taiwan
Jin‐Ming Chen
Department of Electrophysics National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan
Shanmu Dong
Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology
Guanglei Cui
Qingdao Industrial Energy Storage Research Institute, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology