Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).
Abstract
7535 Background: In patients with NDMM, therapy after ASCT aims to deepen remission and prolong survival. Although lenalidomide (R) monotherapy after ASCT is well established, the impact of combination therapy on survival remains to be established. Interim results of the ATLAS study suggested that extended KRd after ASCT treatment prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with R alone in patients with NDMM (Dytfeld et al, Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24:139–150). Here we provide the results from the primary analysis of the ATLAS study. Methods: This international, open-label phase 3 study randomly assigned adults with NDMM who completed induction and had stable disease or better after ASCT 1:1 to KRd or R alone as maintenance therapy. Randomization was stratified by post-transplant response, presence or absence of ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality, and by country. For the KRd group, patients with standard-risk cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10 -5 after cycle 6 were switched to R maintenance after cycle 8; remaining patients continued KRd up to 36 cycles and then switched to R. The preplanned primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), MRD negativity, response rate, and safety. Results: At data cutoff (21 Oct 2024), median follow up was 5.7 years. The median number of treatment cycles initiated was 35 and 31 for KRd and R, respectively. After cycle 8, 40 of 81 patients on KRd switched to R. The 4-year PFS rate with KRd was superior to R (67.5% vs 36.8%; HR 0.46 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.70]; p=0.0002). The PFS benefit was consistent across subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetics (HR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.24, 1.1]) and MRD-positive status at randomization (HR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.93)]. Median PFS was 72.8 months and 37.3 months in the KRd and R groups, respectively. The 4-year OS rate also was increased with KRd vs R (84.3% vs 79.2%; HR 0.49 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.90]; p=0.02). The depth of response improved across all response categories; the rate of MRD <10 - 5 and at least a complete response as best response was 74% and 51% (OR 2.7 [95% CI: 1.5, 5.1]; (p=0.002), and 12-month sustained MRD-negativity was 48% and 24% (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5, 5.5]; p=0.001) for KRd and R, respectively. No new safety signals were observed (Table). Conclusions: The ATLAS phase 3 study demonstrated superior PFS as well as longer OS with MRD-directed, risk-stratified KRd treatment compared with R alone in patients with NDMM after ASCT. Extended KRd maintenance treatment may represent a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02659293 . Treatment emergent adverse events. Patients, n (%) KRd(n=91) R(n=87) Any grade 89 (98) 83 (95) Grade ≥3 72 (79) 64 (74) Grade 5 2 (2.2) a 2 (2.3) b Any serious adverse event 29 (32) 20 (23) a Lung infection (n=2). b Lung/Covid infection (n=1); heart failure (n=1).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak
University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Tomasz Wróbel
Krzysztof Jamroziak
Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Tadeusz Kubicki
1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Pawel Robak
14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland
Jaroslaw Czyz
3Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
Agata Tyczyńska
Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Hematology and Transplantology and University Clinical Center Gdańsk, Department of Hematology, Transplantology and Cellular Therapies, Gdańsk, Poland
Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek
9Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
Krzysztof Giannopoulos
14Medical University of Lublin, Department of Experimental Hematooncology, Lublin, Poland
Anna Łojko-Dankowska
Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Magdalena Matuszak
1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
Lidia Gil
Bartosz Puła
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw, Poland
Justyna Rybka
Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz
Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Olga Czabak
Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
Anna Ewa Pula
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Benjamin Avi Derman
The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Theodore Karrison
Dominik Dytfeld