Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

A Andrzej J. Jakubowiak (University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL) T Tomasz Wróbel K Krzysztof Jamroziak (Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland) T Tadeusz Kubicki (1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland) P Pawel Robak (14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland) J Jaroslaw Czyz (3Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland) A Agata Tyczyńska (Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Hematology and Transplantology and University Clinical Center Gdańsk, Department of Hematology, Transplantology and Cellular Therapies, Gdańsk, Poland) A Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek (9Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland) K Krzysztof Giannopoulos (14Medical University of Lublin, Department of Experimental Hematooncology, Lublin, Poland) A Anna Łojko-Dankowska (Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland) M Magdalena Matuszak (1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland) L Lidia Gil B Bartosz Puła (Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw, Poland) J Justyna Rybka L Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz (Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland) O Olga Czabak (Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland) A Anna Ewa Pula (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) B Benjamin Avi Derman (The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) T Theodore Karrison D Dominik Dytfeld

Abstract

7535 Background: In patients with NDMM, therapy after ASCT aims to deepen remission and prolong survival. Although lenalidomide (R) monotherapy after ASCT is well established, the impact of combination therapy on survival remains to be established. Interim results of the ATLAS study suggested that extended KRd after ASCT treatment prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared with R alone in patients with NDMM (Dytfeld et al, Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24:139–150). Here we provide the results from the primary analysis of the ATLAS study. Methods: This international, open-label phase 3 study randomly assigned adults with NDMM who completed induction and had stable disease or better after ASCT 1:1 to KRd or R alone as maintenance therapy. Randomization was stratified by post-transplant response, presence or absence of ≥1 high-risk cytogenetic abnormality, and by country. For the KRd group, patients with standard-risk cytogenetics and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10 -5 after cycle 6 were switched to R maintenance after cycle 8; remaining patients continued KRd up to 36 cycles and then switched to R. The preplanned primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), MRD negativity, response rate, and safety. Results: At data cutoff (21 Oct 2024), median follow up was 5.7 years. The median number of treatment cycles initiated was 35 and 31 for KRd and R, respectively. After cycle 8, 40 of 81 patients on KRd switched to R. The 4-year PFS rate with KRd was superior to R (67.5% vs 36.8%; HR 0.46 [95% CI: 0.30, 0.70]; p=0.0002). The PFS benefit was consistent across subgroups, including high-risk cytogenetics (HR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.24, 1.1]) and MRD-positive status at randomization (HR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.29, 0.93)]. Median PFS was 72.8 months and 37.3 months in the KRd and R groups, respectively. The 4-year OS rate also was increased with KRd vs R (84.3% vs 79.2%; HR 0.49 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.90]; p=0.02). The depth of response improved across all response categories; the rate of MRD <10 - 5 and at least a complete response as best response was 74% and 51% (OR 2.7 [95% CI: 1.5, 5.1]; (p=0.002), and 12-month sustained MRD-negativity was 48% and 24% (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.5, 5.5]; p=0.001) for KRd and R, respectively. No new safety signals were observed (Table). Conclusions: The ATLAS phase 3 study demonstrated superior PFS as well as longer OS with MRD-directed, risk-stratified KRd treatment compared with R alone in patients with NDMM after ASCT. Extended KRd maintenance treatment may represent a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02659293 . Treatment emergent adverse events. Patients, n (%) KRd(n=91) R(n=87) Any grade 89 (98) 83 (95) Grade ≥3 72 (79) 64 (74) Grade 5 2 (2.2) a 2 (2.3) b Any serious adverse event 29 (32) 20 (23) a Lung infection (n=2). b Lung/Covid infection (n=1); heart failure (n=1).

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 7535-7535
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

A

Andrzej J. Jakubowiak

University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL

T

Tomasz Wróbel

K

Krzysztof Jamroziak

Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

T

Tadeusz Kubicki

1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

P

Pawel Robak

14Department of General Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Łódź, Poland

J

Jaroslaw Czyz

3Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun, Poland

A

Agata Tyczyńska

Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Hematology and Transplantology and University Clinical Center Gdańsk, Department of Hematology, Transplantology and Cellular Therapies, Gdańsk, Poland

A

Agnieszka Druzd-Sitek

9Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

K

Krzysztof Giannopoulos

14Medical University of Lublin, Department of Experimental Hematooncology, Lublin, Poland

A

Anna Łojko-Dankowska

Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

M

Magdalena Matuszak

1Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

L

Lidia Gil

B

Bartosz Puła

Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Warsaw, Poland

J

Justyna Rybka

L

Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz

Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

O

Olga Czabak

Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland

A

Anna Ewa Pula

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

B

Benjamin Avi Derman

The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

T

Theodore Karrison

D

Dominik Dytfeld